Talk:Faye Travel Insurance
(Redirected from Draft talk:Faye Travel Insurance)
Articles for creation Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Companies Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||
|
I lost the password so created a new account. Old account is SoScRa. --SoScRa2 (talk) 03:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Notability[edit]
This draft was declined with reasoning of "This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article." I looked at the link provided as an example of requirements. A Google search will show hundreds of references, but here are some that I feel support the draft for notability:
- 1. TechCrunch (detailed article and overview of the company) - https://techcrunch.com/2022/05/11/faye-hopes-to-do-for-travel-insurance-what-lemonade-did-for-general-insurance/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHNsgnQ_zkkoStpwZpZGDQlH47rbpN10-Dv8ondnCwblmp-PzIu3kZ3qqJ7WnEz6RJuF_B8PcnfQJ-wYxx5uwwnpEWQ2y0LPQKJQXo1xuKHJLbgK2HEz8owhpkNLP7YA9KlhVGSJ1hAqeKpUUxWd59t7pYlqU3FJV9sMkdWMPLL9
- 2. Israel21c (another detailed article about the company) - https://www.israel21c.org/why-israel-is-disrupting-the-us-insurance-industry/
- 3. Forbes (review of their insurance which shows fact-checked) - https://www.forbes.com/advisor/travel-insurance/faye-travel-insurance-review/
- 4. Los Angeles Times (another review that shows it was fact-checked by an editor) - https://www.latimes.com/compare-deals/insurance/travel/faye-travel-insurance-review
- 5. Rolling Stone (article discusses a claim that was made they came through on) - https://www.rollingstone.co.uk/culture/vanquished-by-hurricane-unlikely-hero-saves-these-radio-djs-elopement-37765/
- 6. Jerusalem Post (talks about recent funding and then goes into more details about the background of the company) -https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/tech-and-start-ups/article-706534
SoScRa2 (talk) 01:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- You rejected this draft as promotion because of the services section. I included this information as it was part of the sources I thought were needed to show it was notable. I have removed some of the information but it also removes the references. Can you give me advice on how I can do one without the other? SoScRa2 (talk) 02:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SoScRa2:, to be clear, it was not rejected. It was declined with comment so you have a chance to make corrections. I understand the point you make but keep in mind that notability is not about quantity, but quality. I honestly do not know if this would survive AfD but there are two in-depth sources at least along with the many reviews. I will move it to the mainspace but it is possible someone takes it to a deletion discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- You rejected this draft as promotion because of the services section. I included this information as it was part of the sources I thought were needed to show it was notable. I have removed some of the information but it also removes the references. Can you give me advice on how I can do one without the other? SoScRa2 (talk) 02:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)