File:Radiantbaby.png

Keith Haring's Radiant Baby

This image represents a two-dimensional work of art, such as a drawing, painting, print, or similar creation. The copyright for this image is likely owned by either the artist who created it, the individual who commissioned the work, or their legal heirs. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of artworks: for purposes of critical commentary on: the specific work in question, the artistic genre or technique employed in the artwork, or the artistic school or tradition to which the artist is associated, as applied within the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers located in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other use of this image, whether on Wikipedia or elsewhere, could potentially constitute a copyright infringement. For further information, please refer to Wikipedia's guidelines on non-free content. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Radiantbaby.png true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Fair Use Rationale[edit]

The image linked here is claimed to be used under fair use as:

1. The subject of the image is a historically significant artwork as one of the cornerstone works that the Pop art art movement was founded upon in North America.
2. The image is only being used for informational purposes to depict one of the most important art works in the article.
3. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it exemplifies an important topic from this article.
4. copies made from it will be of very inferior quality to the original,
5. the image is only being used for the purpose of analysis or criticism,
6. there is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.