File talk:Microsoft-Staff-1978.jpg

Better quality version[edit]

On a serious note... Is it worth replacing this with a better quality version, such as This? I mean without the green artifacts? Fosnez 16:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

+

hot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.208.113.209 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 22 October 2005‎

and hotter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.15.126.133 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 5 December 2005

much like Today's staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.15.126.133 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 6 December 2005

OMFG LOL[edit]

omg now that picture is funny :D

--84.47.24.103 15:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The picture of Bill Gates is just hilarious. Khoi khoi 00:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awsome[edit]

I wished I could have worked with gates... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheQaq0 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Couldn't that easily be fixed with a copy of POHOTOSOP? Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair to use[edit]

The full set of 20th century evil nerds! It cannot and mustn't be used! Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use rationale[edit]

The non-free use rationale was disputed for some articles. At DRV, the deleting admin acknowledged that the rationale was good enough for at least one article where the image was in use. That is enough to keep the image. If the rationale is not good enough for other articles, the solution is to remove the image from those articles, not to delete the image. GRBerry 13:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]