Talk:2001 FA Cup final/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Ok taking a look now.Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd append the last line of the lead onto the third para.
  • It marked the first time that the two managers of opposing sides were born outside of the British Isles, and it was anticipated the final would receive a big overseas audience because of the inclusion of several international players - err, was this borne out in viewer ratings? Be good to append here...
  • Why not incorporate Owen's reflection into the text rather than as a EL at end? He was the magic player after all....

Looks Good otherwise....very little to complain about. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for having a look at this @Casliber:, think I've addressed all your points now. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: - great, well done. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]