Talk:2011 OPERA faster-than-light neutrino anomaly/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Yankeesrule3 (talk · contribs) 19:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC) I will be reviewing this GAN, but please expect short breaks if my GAN (alkali metal) gets reviewed while I am reviewing this.[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

I'm sorry, but I will have to speedy fail this article; the article is very subject to edit wars which cannot be solved by semi-protection; the users are all registered. I know a lot about physics, but this article is still extremely confusing for me to understand, and the image captions are not suitable. It also needs to establish much more context, and I noticed a substantial bias against the subject of the article on the first read-through.