Talk:Footprints in the Sand (Leona Lewis song)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1111tomica (talk · contribs) 19:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't any disambiguation links, however the FN 41 is dead. You have to remove it, together with its information. — Tomica (talk) 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox
Lead
Background and composition
  • "Footprints in the Sand" was written by Simon Cowell, David Kreuger, Per Magnusson and Richard Page in 2007 at Rokstone Studios, London, England.[1][2] and it was produced by Steve Mac.[1] ---> "Footprints in the Sand" was written by Simon Cowel, David Kreuger, Per Magnusson and Richard Page, while the production was helmed by Steve Mac. It was recorded in 2007 at Rokstone Studios in London. — Tomica (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • by the choir ---> by a choir — Tomica (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The song is an adaptation of the Christian poem "Footprints",[8] and Lewis commented "Originally it was a poem; it's very inspirational so we put it into a song. I think it is very moving, with a very emotional lyric and I really love to sing this song" ---> It contains an adaptation of the Christian poem "Footprints".[8] Regarding the song, Lewis commented "Originally it was a poem; it's very inspirational so we put it into a song. I think it is very moving, with a very emotional lyric and I really love to sing this song"— Tomica (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • They took the idea to a songwriting session the pair already had scheduled with Page at his home in Malibu, California and they finished the song the following day.---> They accepted the idea for co-writing and had scheduled session in Page's home in Malibu, California, succeeding to finishe the full song for one day. — Tomica (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The song is about "standing by someone and being there for people who need your help. ---> According to who? — Tomica (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • In an interview with HitQuarters, Magnusson said they had thought the song would be a good idea for Westlife, but it was offered to Lewis instead.[10] ---> This should go before the one above. — Tomica (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Release and promotion
  • On 29 January 2008, Lewis announced on her website that "Footprints in the Sand", along with "Better in Time" ---> Do we have source for this? — Tomica (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The song was remixed for the single release ---> Was remixed ? What happened? The composition was changed, vocal by other artist were added, mash-up? — Tomica (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The music video for "Footprints in the Sand" premiered on her official website and BBC Radio 1's website on 27 February 2008.[22] It was filmed in Johannesburg, South Africa,[12][23] and was directed by British director Sophie Muller back-to-back with the video for "Better in Time". ---> The accompanying music video was filmed in Johannesburg, South Africa,[12][23] and was directed by British director Sophie Muller back-to-back with the video for "Better in Time". It premiered on Lewis' official website and the BBC Radio 1's website on 27 February 2008.[22]. — Tomica (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Optional: Is the video released on iTunes? You can added if that happened in the paragraph. — Tomica (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception
Covers
Other sections
Charts
References
  1. 3 Link the publisher and work
  1. 4, the title should not be in italics, the publisher is = Musicnotes.com. Sony/ATV Music Publishing
  1. 7 publisher=MTV Networks or Viacom, + link both MTV News and the modified publisher
  1. 8 Linking needed
  1. 14 publisher is also needed BBC
  1. 15 Link Hachetted Filipachi Ltd
  1. 16 Linking needed
  1. 19 Why there is not outside link for the reference?
    • Because I couldn't find a reliable source for the Sports Relief of that year. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry, but how should I know that it contains the information? — Tomica (talk) 21:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • A video of her performance. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Mmmm is this the official YouTube Sport Relief channel? Don't think so. YouTube link could be used only if they are uploaded from official channels. Sorry Tbnotch, find reliable source or otherwise you will have to remove the information.— Tomica (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
            • And again, just because there is no source it does not mean that the event didn't happen. I didn't use that link per WP:ELNEVER, buy {{Cite episode}} exists for a reason, Will you remove a link of a magazine or a book just because you don't have it? WP:FILMPLOT applies here. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  1. 28 Link BBC Music
  1. 33 publisher=Prometheus Global Media + link Billboard
  1. 34 Bad title, + UK Singles Chart should be also in publisher
  1. 35 publisher should also be Irish Music Charts
  1. 37 Unlink the Official Charts Company
  1. 43 Official and Channel, both with capital letters
  1. 44 Here and everywhere, Official Website, again with capital letters

The references are poor, re-work them. — Tomica (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All in all
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Footprints_in_the_Sand_(Leona_Lewis_song)/GA2&oldid=1181256463"