Talk:Get It Right (Glee cast song)/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you saw my review before, (got your message) and looking through it the changes you have made seem to have developed the article correctly. I will be looking through it in more detail tomorrow but the bets are that it is going to become a GA.

Original review[edit]

Prose[edit]

Article is generally well written;

Introduction

The sentence "who produced the song, with his wife, Nikki Hassman," is there need for repetitive commas - "who produced the song with his wife Nikki Hassman". Edit punctuation Microsoft Word grammar check flagged this as incorrect also. --Done.

Background

Same problem as above with the second sentence in the section.--Better
The remainder of the section is very well written and punctuation is excellent.

Composition

Well written, no obvious problems.

Critical reception

Voerding, Who is this? You have previously discussed him in the composition section but for a first time reader it seems as if he is a random person as no publisher is listed in this section only in the composition section. It is confusing. Add more detail.
Other than listed above the section is easy to read, factual and understandable.--Done

Chart performance

Chart positions need its own section change positions to a separate section: Charts.--Done
Well written, factual and clear.

Factually accurate?[edit]

No problems; no outstanding references needed, no original research and all notable.

Coverage[edit]

Factual, doesn't waffle and everything is relevant.

Neutral[edit]

Not biased, Critical reception show a good mix of responses.

Stable[edit]

No edit wars. Stable.

References[edit]

Critical reception

Reference 5 Seattle Post-Intelligencer, it is repeated twice in one continuous sentence. Why? --Done.

Overall[edit]

All the issues have been met, I will pass this now. Thanks for the changes.

Thank you for taking the time to conduct a second review. Much appreciated! Frickative 01:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]