Talk:In Dreams (Roy Orbison song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi editors. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. I should have my analysis up within a few hours. Timmeh 23:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Checklist and analysis

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I am confused by the label shown in the infobox. It says "Monument 806", while the article prose says the song was released on "Monument Records". Is there a difference between the two?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Most of these are book sources, so I'll have to trust you on their content.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Is it possible you could find any information on when and where the song was recorded?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   The issues I found are minor, so there's no reason to go through the trouble of officially putting the review on hold. I'll just wait until my concerns are addressed before passing the article. Timmeh 00:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

"Monument 806" I think was its call number, for lack of the industry term, where record stores could order inventory. Monument was the record company, as noted by the article. If you want the infobox to reflect simply "Monument", that's fine. I haven't made any adjustments to the infobox.

Monument studios were in Nashville. It was recorded in early 1963. I clarified that in the article. --Moni3 (talk) 22:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Great. I've fixed a few things in the infobox, including changing the "Monument 806" to just "Monument", which was the record label on which the song was released. I'm passing the article, as it now looks good for GA. Thanks for fixing the problems I highlighted, and congratulations. Good luck on future GA work. :-) Timmeh 23:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. --Moni3 (talk) 23:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)