Talk:Ringerike Line/GA1

GA Review[edit]

I will be reviewing this article. Canadakid2 (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
"made presidency over distance reductions." - probably not what the intended meaning was. "Took precedence", perhaps? Why is "more" italicized? A minor spacing issue in the final paragraph.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The first two paragraphs in History are uncited; I'm assuming they're related to current ref [12].
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The image in the infobox needs a caption in English - I don't know what it's saying otherwise.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Very good summary of the subject, just needs a nip and tuck here and there. —Rob (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for the review. All matters should have been seen to now. Arsenikk ^(talk) 00:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made a couple further edits, but now it looks good. Thanks! —Rob (talk) 03:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]