Talk:Wilderness Territory

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Wilderness Territory is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hotels Low‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

https://www.wildernessresort.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Developers-History.pdf

Added this information.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 03:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wilderness Territory (Wisconsin Dells) → Wilderness Territory — Keeping it with the (Wisconsin Dells) portion of the name does not represent the whole article. Wilderness Territory now owns resorts outside of the Dells area, in Tennessee, and one planned for Missouri. — WisconsinCheeze (talk) 16:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

Oppose. There are many areas that could be called "wilderness territories". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? Where? There aren't any notable enough to have an article at Wikipedia or even warrant a hatnote. — AjaxSmack 13:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Keeping it with the (Wisconsin Dells) portion of the name does not represent the whole article. Wilderness Territory now owns resorts outside of the Dells area, in Tennessee, and one planned for Missouri. This is the only Wilderness Territory for resort companies. WisconsinCheeze (talk) 16:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Nomination is straighforward and no contra arguments have been presented. — AjaxSmack 02:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hoo boy, this article...[edit]

This article's formatting is...questionable to say the least. It's very sporadic, and not very easy to follow. A lot of it also reads like an advertisement. I'm sure this article would have to be pretty much completely rewritten to better match Wikipedia's quality standards. HyperStormH (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One single self-source!?![edit]

This entire article is promotional original resource advertising featuring a single source--their own! 173.23.42.9 (talk) 17:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]