Talk:Bourne End Academy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education in the United Kingdom (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education in the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Education in the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomEducation in the United Kingdom articles

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Buckinghamshire may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

RfC: Premier Dance School status[edit]

I would like to request a second opinion by other editors regarding the Premier Dance School status that is contested on the article. I can't seem to find a valid source for this, the editor User:Bruno Russell has linked the school itself as a source, but I feel that violates WP:VERIFY as it does not represent a NPOV. Until this is either confirmed or denied with community consensus, I appeal that the content is retained as unsourced with citation needed. + Crashdoom ^Talk 13:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Remove. I found this source on the school's website, but I don't think this is a use permitted by our policy on using primary sources. That policy says "A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge." I don't mean to accuse anyone of dishonesty, and I personally think that the claim is probably true, but without any independent verification we have no way of judging whether the claim was simply made up or not. If we had an independent source to back the claim up, from either the awarding body or a newspaper etc., then I think it would be worthwhile including it. Until we have this verification, the claim should be removed. I'll be happy to answer any questions that anyone might have about my opinion here. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 09:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Remove until better sources are found - I think Stradivarius' interpretation of WP:PRIMARY is correct. If we were to quote the school on a statement it made, that would be considered a primary source. But the school did not award itself "specialist school status". A primary source for that would be the awarding institution. At best, what we could say is that the school claims it was awarded that status. That's how you would use WP:PRIMARY in this case. The material should be removed per WP:BURDEN until better sources and consensus can be found. 159.1.15.34 (talk) 17:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Removed as per consensus I have removed the content in accordance with the editorial consensus on this page. + Crashdoom ^Talk 14:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bourne End Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060803055309/http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/specialistschools/ to http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/specialistschools/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bourne End Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]