Template talk:Pink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Template talk:Pink (color))

Requested move 20 April 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


– The color is by far the most notable use of the word pink. The color template would see much greater use if it was simply titled Template:Pink, since many users probably don't know this template exists at its current title since it adds an unnecessary disambiguation. ANDROS1337TALK 03:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alecia Beth Moore has commonly been presented as P!nk. GregKaye 04:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose/Support support moving the singer's template. oppose moving this template to "pink". Instead it should be called {{pink font}} or {{pink text}} , as that is what it does, it does not create a pink background, or navigate between articles about the color pink. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the other text color templates simply use the color name, so adding the word "font" "or "text" is unnecessary. ANDROS1337TALK 05:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The others should be moved to add font or text, as we have for the past while in a general trend been moving templates to descriptive grammatically correct names instead of having them at non-descriptive confusing ones. There's no reason why this one should not actually indicate what it is in its name. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as proposed - much easier to use this way, versus a template which only needs to be added once per article and then never touched again. That's my take, at least. Red Slash 02:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Current situation is ridiculous (and I'm guessing, engineered by fans of the singer). This is the logical and most practical solution, and consistent with naming of articles such as pink and Pink (singer) and other templates such as template:blue. Andrewa (talk) 22:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.