User talk:Fastily

Art Libraries

Hello my page was deleted probably because I had no time to fix my mistakes. What should i do now I have more time. Should I start again from the beginning or you can help me to get the page back and make the fixes?

Thanks

Susan MIAlibrary2021 (talk) 15:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi MIAlibrary2021. You may not use Wikipedia to promote your business/services or the business/services of a client. Please be advised that repeated violations of this rule will result in loss of editing privileges. Thanks, Fastily 05:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Guinea-Bissau FF (logo).png

Hi Fastily. Would you mind taking a look at File:Guinea-Bissau FF (logo).png? It was just updated, but now it seems to be no different than File:Guinea-Bissau FA.png. I sort of asked about this at WT:NFCC#Updating non-free logos, but I'm pretty sure that two files of what appear to be the same logo are needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly. Thanks for letting me know, I've reverted the overwritten file. Regards, Fastily 09:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Request for reconsideration of decision on deleted page User:Mcrossphd/sandbox

Reference: User:Mcrossphd/sandbox

Dear @Fastily,

I understand your concern about promoting a business, but I'd like to clarify that the page about Ross-Clayton Funeral Home is focused on its historical significance as the oldest funeral home in Montgomery, Alabama, founded in 1918. The page aims to document its history, legacy, and impact on the community, rather than promoting the business itself. Also, there are many similar pages live on Wikipedia with search query "Funeral Home".

To address your concerns, I will make the following changes:

- Emphasized the historical aspects and significance of the funeral home

- Removed any promotional language or content

- Added reliable sources to support the funeral home's notability and historical importance

I believe this page meets Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and verifiability. Please reconsider your decision and allow the page to remain, as it provides valuable information on the history of Montgomery, Alabama.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

@mcrossphd

Mcrossphd (talk) 09:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mcrossphd. You may not use Wikipedia to promote your business/services or the business/services of a client. Please be advised that repeated violations of this rule will result in loss of editing privileges. Thanks, Fastily 09:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Question about WP:AUTHOR

Hey, I hope you are well. I want to get clarification on whether I am right or wrong. If there are two independent reviews available from reliable sources about a book, then does the author pass WP:AUTHOR’s 3rd rule? The reviews are from well known reliable source like The Hindu, Your answer will assist me a lot. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 10:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Grabup. I seldom get involved with notability concerns, so I'm probably not the best person to discuss hypothetical situations with. If you have a concrete example you can share, then I might be able to help. -Fastily 02:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

The book name is “The Book of India Ghosts” here are two reviews: The Hindu and The HinduBusinessline. Can these two reviews which are independent reliable, make the author of the book notable? GrabUp - Talk 03:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

The Hindu (WP:THEHINDU) is considered a reliable source, can't speak to the latter though. You might wish to inquire about this at RSN -Fastily 04:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. For your confirmation, the second one is also considered reliable. Though it is not mentioned in WP:Perennial sources, it is considered reliable for film articles at WP:ICTFSOURCES, which indicates its reliability and acceptance. GrabUp - Talk 04:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Subject: Contesting Speedy Deletion of User Page

Hello Fastily,

I find it extremely perplexing and disheartening that my user page, User Secular Naturalism, has been tagged for speedy deletion under the claim that it is promotional. The page was created in compliance with Wikipedia's guidelines, focusing on personal information, interests relevant to Wikipedia's mission, and my contributions to the platform. Here is the content of the page in question:

---

User Naturalism

About Me Hello! I go by the nickname Secular Naturalism. I am passionate about philosophy, ethics, and the pursuit of knowledge through reason and empirical evidence. My primary interests include:

Natural Law Jurisprudence

• Secular Ethics
• Ecospirituality
• Religious or Spiritual Naturalism
• Philosophical Naturalism
• https://ecospirituality.org

I created this page to organize my contributions to Wikipedia and connect with other users who share similar interests.

My Philosophy

I adhere to the principles of Secular Naturalism, a worldview that integrates:

• Natural Law Jurisprudence: Emphasizing laws derived from nature and human reason.
• Human Reason and Logic: Valuing critical thinking and rational analysis.
• Secular Ethics: Promoting ethical principles independent of religious doctrines.
• Ecospirituality: Recognizing the spiritual significance of nature.
• Philosophical Naturalism: Believing that everything arises from natural properties and causes.

Secular Naturalism rejects moral relativism, religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition as foundations for morality and decision-making. Instead, it advocates for ethical living through reason, empathy, and evidence-based inquiry.

Contributions

I am currently working on various articles related to philosophy and ethics. Some of my recent contributions include:

• Natural Law School of Jurisprudence
• Natural Law World Governmental System

Sandbox

I use my sandbox to draft and test new articles and edits. Feel free to check it out:

User Naturalism/Sandbox

Contact

Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you want to discuss anything related to my interests or contributions.

---

The page includes typical user page content: a brief biography, a summary of my philosophical interests, a list of my contributions, and a sandbox link. It does not serve as an advertisement but rather as a personal introduction and an organizational tool for my activities on Wikipedia.

I strongly urge a reconsideration of the deletion tag, as the content aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines for user pages. If there are specific issues, I am more than willing to make necessary adjustments. However, tagging this page for deletion without a proper review seems unwarranted and undermines the efforts of active contributors.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards, Secular Naturalism Secular Naturalism (talk) 04:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)