Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Caribbean Sea

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Caribbean Sea[edit]

Nominated on 18:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC); needs 18 votes by May 7.

The Caribbean Sea is so large and so important, yet the article is a very sparse three paragraphs? How is this possible? We MUST fix this.

Support:

  1. PDXblazers 18:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Y Ynhockey (Talk) Y 21:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. RexNL 23:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. CrnaGora (Talk | Contribs | E-mail) 20:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Davodd 22:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Juan Scott 16:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sarge Baldy 08:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. - Darwinek 09:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yarnalgo 03:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Avala 20:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. YankeeDoodle14 16:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Andromeda321 17:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 21:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Caponer 00:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. AndyZ t 01:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Thefourdotelipsis 08:35, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • Although it seems small, it also seems complete to me. -- Mac Davis] ⌇☢ ญƛ. 04:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • What about all the countries in the Caribbean? Or shipping? Tourism? Cruises? Flora and Fauna? Destruction of the coral reefs? There is so much more that could be written. This article is most certainly puny. PDXblazers 03:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some of these things are already covered in (or linked from) the article Caribbean, and the Cat:Caribbean includes other articles. This article on the C. Sea might already have all the information in other articles that are up. --EncycloPetey 11:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Collaboration_of_the_week/Caribbean_Sea&oldid=1138417325"