Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:BlueMorningGloryClose.jpg

Blue Morning[edit]

Reason: Nice enough, but zero enc because of the crop, and resolution is lacking
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/BlueMorningGloryClose.jpg
Nominator: Noodle snacks (talk)

Delist — Noodle snacks (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Until the other day, it was the only cropped image of a flower: unacceptable. This just recently passed, but the point is to get a close-up view of the disc florets (hence its presence in Inflorescence). ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 08:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For this, and the three others below, did you notify the nominator and/or photographer? MER-C 00:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A distraction caused me to leave the computer before that, but its done now. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The saturation is way too exaggerated. Zoo Fari 04:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Unclear what species, borderline size, and the Morning glory article demonstrates that there are better ways to illustrate the subject (I guess that's why this pic got relegated to a gallery). Narayanese (talk) 09:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Pretty, but I'm inclined to agree with the above. At a slightly different angle, though, this sort of thing could be a useful and attractive way to present the stigma and/or stamens, so I wouldn't deny such images out of hand. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 07:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. Cacophony (talk) 06:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist pretty much per nom, while it's a nice image the quality is low and because of the angle the encyclopedic value is much lower than it could be to illustrate the subject. Cat-five - talk 09:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted MER-C 10:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]