Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight/Timeline of spaceflight working group

Spaceflight: Timeline of spaceflight Project‑class

	Spaceflight portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This page is supported by the timeline of spaceflight working group.

Status[edit]

Hi gang!

I have been plugging away on 1966 in spaceflight and should be done shortly. It looks like the status page hasn't been updated in a decade (except for mine today). Would someone like to take over admin for this page? I'm happy to do what I can with it, but I don't know how to update percentages.

--Neopeius (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Completed October of 1966 in spaceflight. --Neopeius (talk) 15:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Spaceflight_before_1951 is done, will submit for FL review after I go through again to make sure I haven't missed anything.

1966 in spaceflight is done so far as orbital launches are concerned. Still needs citations, summaries, proofreading, and a lede. --Neopeius (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1951 in spaceflight and 1952 in spaceflight are now done, too. --Neopeius (talk) 03:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have been plugging away on 1968 in spaceflight and finished the table.--Akrasia25 (talk) 21:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotakarhu: I think I've got 1953 in spaceflight and 1954 in spaceflight good enough for the spot reviews you've been doing. I need to do a little more expansion of the article section on 1954, but the tables are good.

I haven't started on 1955 -> yet. If you enjoy filling out tables, you could go forward on that. Or you can wait for me to do the first pass, and we can continue doing the one-two punch method, which seems to be working nicely. :) --Neopeius (talk) 13:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]