2022 Morbi bridge collapse

On October 30, 2022, a pedestrian suspension bridge over the Machchhu River in the city of Morbi in Gujarat, India, collapsed, causing the deaths of at least 141 people and injuries to more than 180 others.

The 19th-century bridge had reopened five days earlier, in time for Diwali and the Gujarati New Year, following a lengthy closure for repairs.

Background
Jhulto Pul (ઝૂલતો પુલ; "hanging bridge") was a 230 m, 1.25 m pedestrian suspension bridge, 15 m over the Machchhu River, connecting the districts of Mahaprabhuji and Samakantha. It was built during British rule in India in the 19th century. Dates for its construction vary, but according to locals, it was built in the 1880s by Waghji Thakore, the local maharaja. It connected Darbargadh Palace with Nazarbag Palace (now Lukhdhirji Engineering College), the residences of the erstwhile royal family of Morbi State.

At that time, there was a limit of fifteen people on the bridge at once, as the narrow structure meant it swayed with any greater weight.

In recent times the bridge was owned and operated as a toll bridge by the Morbi municipality, which signed a contract with the Morbi-based private trust Oreva – a company known for making clocks – for maintenance and operations on 7 March 2022. The fifteen-year contract was with Oreva's flagship company, Ajanta Manufacturing Private Limited, which had been involved with the bridge since 2008. The agreement covered the maintenance and management of the bridge. The toll bridge reopened on 26 October 2022 on the occasion of the Gujarati New Year, after being closed for repairs for six months. At the re-opening ceremony, Oreva's managing director told the reporters that the people could enjoy a "care-free adventure" and the bridge would not need any major work for another eight to ten years.

Collapse
On 30 October 2022, five days after reopening, the bridge collapsed at 6:40p.m. More than 500 people were on the bridge at the time of the collapse, far exceeding the official capacity of 125. Security footage of the bridge showed the structure shaking violently and people holding onto cables and fencing on either side of the bridge before the walkway gave way. Images of rescue and recovery operations showed the walkway had divided at its midpoint, with some pieces still hanging from snapped cables.

A survivor said that so many people on the bridge could barely move and that pieces of the bridge crushed some victims. Mohan Kundariya, a Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha who lost 12 family members including his sister in the incident, said he believed the cause was overloading. A spokesperson for Oreva said that it appeared too many people were in the middle section of the bridge "trying to sway it".

The teams of State Disaster Response Force of Gujarat along with National Disaster Response Force started rescue operations. Later they were joined by Army, Navy, and Air Force staff. Police, military, and disaster response teams were deployed for rescue operations.

Victims
At least 141 people were confirmed dead and more than 180 were rescued. A large number of the victims were women, the elderly, and children (39 boys and 16 girls) with the youngest fatality being an 18-month-old baby.

The Government of Gujarat announced an ex gratia payment of inr 400000 to the next of kin of each person who died, and inr 50000 to the injured.

Investigation
Initial reports said that the bridge was reopened early after repairs, without the required certificate of fitness from the local civic authorities of Morbi municipality. The chief officer of the municipality, who had agreed on the contract for repairs after the 2001 earthquake, said the private firm responsible for the renovations "threw the bridge open to visitors without notifying us, and therefore, we couldn't get a safety audit of the bridge conducted".

A forensic report presented in court said that the bridge could not withstand the weight of the new heavy flooring given the cables were rusted, it had broken anchors, and the bolts connecting the aforementioned two were loose. A five-member committee was formed by the Government of Gujarat to investigate and determine the cause. Nine people, all associated with the Oreva group, were arrested and subject to investigation: two managers and two ticket clerks employed by Oreva, two contractors, and three hired security guards.

A first information report was filed against the maintenance and management agencies of the bridge under sections 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 308 (intentional act causing death), and 114 (abettor present when offence committed) of the Indian Penal Code.