Category talk:11th-century Kings of the Romans

No category for 10th century
See Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_11. – Fayenatic  L ondon 16:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Opposed speedy move request

 * Category:11th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:11th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:12th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:12th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:13th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:13th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:14th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:14th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:15th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:15th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:16th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:16th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:17th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:17th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:18th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:18th-century kings of the Romans
 * Category:19th-century Kings of the Romans to Category:19th-century kings of the Romans
 * Oppose Kings of the Romans nominations. "King of the Romans" is a full title, it has nothing to do with Romans. Also, this has been on full discussion before. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Marcocapelle: How is this different from MOS:JOBTITLES? King becomes kings when pluralized in all applications that I'm aware of. What more is a discussion supposed to yield? Hey man im josh (talk) 14:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Following up on this in case you missed the ping @Marcocapelle. Is the idea that "Kings of the Romans" is itself a proper title? Hey man im josh (talk) 12:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * That is right. This should be at full CfD. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)