Category talk:2007 Samjhauta Express bombings

Categories
The event has not been conclusively linked to Hindu or Islamic groups. Attempts to target one community with a "terrorism" tag in the face of a lack of convictions, or of the US being convinced that Arif Qasmani is the perpetrator are politically mischievous.Pectoretalk 04:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You're making exactly the same arguments which you made a year ago, and in which editors like me and Silverseren already clarified our points. The consensus was to apply the Hindu terrorism category on events which have suspected links to Hindutva organisations or people. A description was also devised by Qwyrxian for the Hindu terrorism category to clarify how the categorisation system works for this category. You're clearly persisting in the same behavior again and ignoring all the previous discussion that took place. Your edits seem to represent a WP:Conflict of interest, WP:POV-pushing and can be construed as vandalism. I advise you not to continue senseless reverts on these pages, as your rationale conflicts with what has already been agreed upon. Mar4d (talk) 05:59, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I do not believe until an investigation is finished, that either tag should be put. I have consistently removed the Islamic tag from the articles as well. If "WP:POV-Pushing" and "WP:Conflict of Interest" (thanks for turning Wikipedia policies into a punchline) consists of being fair to all parties and waiting for convictions then I must be a revert-warring troll. Also "what has already been agreed upon" does not exist, there is no evidence of any consensus on inclusion into this category. Now onto actual examples of POV-pushing, which unsurprisingly, stem from your end. If the article has both "Hindu" and "Islamic" tags, pray do tell me the logic in placing only the "Hindu" tag on this category . Pakistani nationalism has no place in this category, related pages, or anywhere on Wikipedia.Pectoretalk 18:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)