Category talk:Classical Revival architecture

where is the article?
where is the article that describes this type of architecture? Hmains (talk) 02:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * It hasn't been written, kind of like Georgian Revival (redirects to Georgian architecture) and Stripped Classicism. You might find these helpful. APK (If You Wanna)  07:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * As Classical Revival architecture redirects to Neoclassical architecture, perhaps this category should follow.- choster (talk) 01:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * As previously mentioned, Classical Revival architecture is a redirect because no one has created the article. Georgian Revival architecture redirects to Georgian architecture, yet Category:Georgian Revival architecture exists because they're similar, but separate, architectural styles (see Category:Revival architectural styles).  Classical Revival architecture is a distinct style; otherwise, nomination forms for structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places would not list these properties as being designed in the Classical Revival style. APK  whisper in my ear  02:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Can I ask you to refrain from removing articles in Category:Classical Revival architecture until a discussion takes place? APK whisper in my ear  02:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Apologies for stepping on any toes, but turning on the light would help a little: a mention of "Classical Revival" as a distinctive style somewhere in the redirect destination, even one-sentence, or listing the style separately at Architectural style, which is where I checked first. I have restored the category to Apex Historic District, although as elsewhere we characterize Classical Revival as a type of Neoclassical, I did not see that categorization as incorrect. - choster (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

US subcat
Is there some reason that these articles are being kept in this cat directly instead of being moved to Category:Classical Revival architecture in the United States or its subcats? I can take care of doing this work if there are no objections. Hmains (talk) 03:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC) aee