Category talk:Codes of conduct

Too broad
This category is too broad in its inclusion. I deleted a few non-codes of conduct such as five solas and affluenza, but there are a ton more that should be excised. I can help with this via AWB, but I didn't want to do it unilaterally since it is such a large change. What sayest ye? What sort of thing belongs here and what doesn't? --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 14:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

RFC: too broad
This category is too broad in its inclusion. I deleted a few non-codes of conduct such as five solas and affluenza, but there are a ton more that should be excised (e.g., Higher Power, Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, Social Gospel, Disciple (Christianity), etc. etc.). I can help with this via AWB, but I didn't want to do it unilaterally since it is such a large change. What sayest ye? What sort of thing belongs here and what doesn't? Gray areas would include entries such as Norm (philosophy), Pledge of Allegiance, Blue Laws, etc. --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 13:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Be bold. I might get rid of Humanitarian crisis, Jesus movement, City upon a hill, Ponzi scheme, USA PATRIOT Act, Dianetics, Eternal sin and Uniform Vehicle Code, too. None of these discuss codes of conduct.Phyesalis (talk) 05:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * You could remove WWJD because it is essentially the same as some others. Fleetflame (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Rename?
Rename to Category:Codes of conduct per Naming conventions (categories)? Cander0000 (talk) 09:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)