Category talk:Eco-terrorism

Biased
This category is WAY too biased. Who defines what is eco-terrorism? These groups will never self acknowledge as eco-terrorists. Poor wording, I'd say. Pikolas (talk) 10:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I dunno. I'll confess to a little ecotage I was involved in back in 1969. It delayed work on a later abandoned planned new road through a sensitive alpine national park. And I'm proud of what I did! HiLo48 (talk) 05:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I think if you check out the eco-terrorism page you'll find that the article adopts the FBI's definition which is listed at the top of that article. Also, it's not a list of eco-terrorists but rather articles pertaining to eco-terrorism. Hope that helps. 68.41.80.161 (talk) 04:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Accusations of criminal activities
Given this category's parent categories and the issues (including, for articles on people, BLP issues) related with accusations of criminal or "terrorist" actions, no person or organization should be placed directly in this category unless actually convicted of a criminal act related to eco-terrorism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * BLP refers to living persons. Why would you chose to move SSCS and not all the others accused of such? Besides, there are many articles listed here that aren't people being accused of terrorism but simply relevant articles on the topic. SSCS is most definitely a relevant article on the topic. 76.112.8.146 (talk) 04:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)