Category talk:Labour relations organisations

Contested deletion
This category should not be speedy deleted as being unpopulated, because... (it takes into account organisations that exist in countries that do not use American spelling. There is no consensus to use "labor" over "labour". Even the international spelling is "Labour" (e.g. International Labour Organisation) --Bookscale (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not the point. Global categories such as  are never duplicated with categories using alternative spellings;  is a redirect. A local Australian subcat (if any) would correctly use 'Labour' eg Category:Labour in Australia, Category:Organisations based in Australia. The (global) category is  (following  and, organization). Category:Labour relations organisations has to be a redirect if it exists (but you blanked it for some reason). You could take  to cfd and suggest a rename, but there is little chance it would succeed. Oculi (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Why? it's inconsistent with the international spelling! Bookscale (talk) 11:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Because of and  and consistency of spelling of category names at the global level. Australian articles will not necessarily have categories with Australian spelling, cf Tim Cahill. US articles will not necessarily have categories with US spelling; eg Ohio River Bridges Project is in the global  whereas US uses transportation. Oculi (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * There was a cfd proposal to change to  back in 2013 which I see I supported, in vain. Oculi (talk) 12:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)