Category talk:Low-importance Hinduism articles

== It is immature and incorrect to name Hindu Mythology and Theology as 'Low Importance' ad so on.

It is immature and incorrect to name some or many Hindu mythology and theology as 'Low Importance'. Throughout Hinduism and even in scriptures these items were never mentioned, neither classified nor referred as low importance. Who is making these decisions that are inconsistent and inaccurate and immature to clasifiy things as unimportant, low important and so on. These classifications are AT BEST subjective.

Let people decide what is important and not important or what is relevant and not relevant. The classification and categorization should be objective and wikipedia is not the place to make something as important and low-important.

Officially, recording this as a disagreement in the talk page. Because we don't want to create an impression to the public there is such thing as low or high important so classified in Hindu texts exists.

I am even questioning the qualification and the profile of people who maintain/manage these articles or have the power to decide what is low important and/or otherwise.