Category talk:Peniarth collection

The new category
Should individual texts be included in this new category? I noticed this in the case of Ystorya Adaf. It's a text afer all, not a ms ("The Ystorya Adaf survives in four manuscripts, Peniarth 5, Peniarth 7, Peniarth 14, and Havod 22"). It's not the only text found in those four manuscripts, of course. Should every text of which a copy is found in any of the Peniarth ms be included in the category? That doesn't seem very logical. Enaidmawr (talk) 18:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I've simply been too hasty when adding categories. I've removed it now. Cavila (talk) 18:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, Cavila. Thanks for the category. Good to see en: catching up with cy: (well, it's not often I can say that, so forgive the impudence!). Enaidmawr (talk) 18:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)