Category talk:Pseudoscientific physicists

Opposed speedy move request

 * Category:Pseudoscientific physicists to Category:Pseudophysicists – C2C: And main article Pseudophysics. But leave the old title as a redirect. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 08:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose speedy Pseudoscience is by its nature controversial. Also Category:Advocates of pseudoscience has amix of formats: Pseudoarchaeologists‎ and Pseudoastronomers‎, but also Pseudoscientific biologists‎, Pseudoscientific diet advocates, Pseudoscientific physicists‎ and Pseudoscientific psychologists‎. TSventon (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * "Pseudoscience is by its nature controversial" has no bearing on the decision between "Pseudoscientific physicists" and "Pseudophysicists" because pseudophysics is also "by its nature controversial".
 * "has a mix a formats" is not the same as "should have a mix of formats".
 * So, both reasons are invalid. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I just checked the articles in the category:
 * Jim Carter (pseudoscientist)
 * Masaru Emoto
 * Corentin Louis Kervran
 * Stefan Marinov
 * Mohamed El Naschie
 * Kauko Armas Nieminen
 * Viktor Petrik
 * Of those, only Marinov is actually a physicist. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)