Category talk:Record producers from Georgia

Caucasian republic v. Caucasian region
Hello, can we discuss your reversion of my edit that changed Caucasian republic to Caucasian region? I had based my edit on Georgia and Georgia (country) which both say the country is in the Caucasus region of Eurasia. Reliable sources including, , , , and support this classification and, frankly, I've not found one source that references the area as a republic; not one. Do you know something that others do not? If so, can you reliably source any such claim? In terms of disputed content, one could hardly be of less consequence, but I would prefer for accuracy to prevail. Can you help me understand why the status quo should remain. Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 20:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * "The sovereign state of Georgia is a unitary semi-presidential republic, with the government elected through a representative democracy." Sources:
 * https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-23072361
 * https://georgiaabout.com/tag/republic-of-georgia/
 * https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gg.html
 * http://parliament.ge/uploads/other/28/28803.pdf
 * I'm confused as to how you couldn't find the CIA World Factbook or Georgia's constitution but that aside, why should it change? Is it really important to change this one word on a disambiguation category? ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:41, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * That the sovereign state of Georgia is a republic is not in dispute; nor the others like Chechnya and Dagestan as well. I contend that the sovereign Republic of Georgia, itself, does not lie within a larger republic, but instead, that the area containing Georgia, and the other republics, is called the Caucasus region (or Caucasus mountains at times) but never the Caucasus republic. When I made the change, the matter seemed clear to me and I didn't expect it to raise a contest. "Is it really important to change this one word on a disambiguation category?" No it is not, and I haven't started an edit war on the matter. I did say: "In terms of disputed content, one could hardly be of less consequence" and I won't bother with it any further. Cheers, and be well; I appreciate your reply.--John Cline (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)