Category talk:Song stubs

Untitled
If any of these songs have any TV/Movie occurances (e.g. commercial ads, PSAs, TV shows, movies, etc.), mention those occurances in these stub articles. --TheSamurai 03:18, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Any songs in this category and some songs articles outside this category should have information about who covered/sampled the song, and the predecessors of the song (i.e. this song contains fragments of or is a cover of that musicians song). --TheSamurai 14:16, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I had a tip to obtain TV/Movie occurance info in an individual song; go to IMbB.com and click tips on the search box, and look for soundtracks button after that. --TheSamurai 03:08, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Should we make new stub categories to contract this stub category (e.g. Rock song stubs, Classical music stubs, blues stubs, rap stubs, etc.)? --SuperDude 20:46, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Why is there no distinction being made between a single and a song? Maybe time to start Template:single-stub? Brz7
 * I agree. I have just created a Template:single-stub since there is a difference. If anyone has a problem, just say it. I haven't changed any existing aritcles to it (just in case there are problems), but added it to an article which needed a stub tag, and created another article which didn't exist at all before. The articles are Dangerous and Moving (single) and How Soon is Now? - Gerbon689 15:36, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Generally stubs are proposed on WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals before being created. As it wasn't, it's now listed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries. --Mairi 03:47, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Problem
Am I the only one that has noticed that each article with added in is added to the non-existent category Category:Song Stubs? There are several articles in it, but not as many as are in Category:Song stubs. I'm not sure what the problem is or what is causing it. It has me stumped. I saw that a particular song had the Song Stub (note the case) category, and figured that it had been miscategorized by a careless editor and tried to fix it, but then I realized that the was causing the categorization. I checked several other articles, and they all had the Song Stub category in the category list, even though not all of them appear on the actual page. Furthermore, you can only get to this Song Stubs category by clicking a link, not by typing it in the search bar. -- D a l k a e n T / C 01:34, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The problem is that an old version of &#123;{song-stub}} used Category:Song Stubs. So articles added then, and not edited since, showed up in that category, because of a bug in how categories on templates work. Null edits (or any other edits) on the affected articles fix the problem; I've done so and now that category is empty. --Mairi 02:17, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clearing that up and, more importantly, fixing the problem. :P -- D a l k a e n T / C 08:00, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

A few of these "songs" are technically not songs
A few of these "songs" are technically not songs; for example Donna Lee and Reveille, because they do not (did not originally, at least) have lyrics, and were not composed to be sung by the voice. Perhaps there should be one or more categories for "non-classical compositions", "jazz compositions", "tunes", "melodies", or some such. Any thoughts? --Lph 17:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

New categorys may not be needed
I ran a regex on this stub category(song stub) for rock songs. These songs should be in the rock song stubs category. In short I found 42 songs that were rock songs. I placed them in the rock song category.
 * What I mean to say is that if 42 out of approx 423 articles in this category fit into one subcategory than I wonder how many will fit into each of the other categorys.
 * P.S that is approx 5.8% of the articles in this category. Eagle (talk) (desk) 03:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)