Category talk:Spaceflights

wording on this category page
I have changed the wording on this category page, to avoid hundreds of articles which are not changing rapidly from having a template added which says that they are changing rapidly due to ongoing events. Rnt20 08:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

A rose is a rose...
Juliet said, "That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Since I agree, I'm not going to comment much on the name this category now has, i.e. Category:Spaceflights. I just want assert strongly that last season's roses don't still smell sweet: they're dead and rotten. So please can we keep a category scoped to "active" spaceflights? Use any reasonable definition of active; just please don't include all the decomissioned but still flying stuff! (sdsds - talk) 01:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I am beginning procedures to take this issue to Deletion Review. The closing admin did not appear to have read the finer points of the discussion, and closed against consensus. -- G W … 22:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

strange sorting
This is odd... the entry for STS-132 is showing up under a breakhead of lower-case a, not under S. I don't see anything on that page that would account for it.Długosz (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC)