Category talk:Start-Class LGBT articles

Peer Review
The bibliography had viable sources; there was only 3 in there and 4 in the main article. More the reliable sources would strengthen the article.

In the articles the sections are scarce on information, every section could use more information to help fill out article.

There are content gaps in the " 21st century" and the "1950s: Organizations Begin" section. Chmw8 (talk) 04:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)