Category talk:Sword and sorcery films

Proposed rename
I'd like to oppose the suggested category renaming. The Sword and sorcery article puts forth the seminal works of sword and sorcery as being literature, and describes it as a genre that is not limited to one media like film, and perhaps a category should be created to encompass the print works listed in the article. Category:Sword and sorcery should probably exist, but only as an umbrella cat to encompass Category:Sword and sorcery films (which is where this rename should really go) and the as-yet nonexistent Category:Sword and sorcery literature. Ford MF (talk) 19:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see the need for so many categories. Just one will suffice. That's one of the reasons why I made the request in the first place. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Why? We distinguish categorically between film, literature and other media in cases of other genres.  In fact, I can't think of a single genre that has one category for all its media.  Ford MF (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I see your point. If you think it's that necessary to have all of those categories then be bold and create them. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)