Category talk:User nn-N

Merge User no-N and User nn-N?
I think the category User nn-N ought to be merged with User no-N.

Now that there have been created separate babel templates for bokmål and nynorsk, I suppose it is OK to keep all of and But I think it makes sense to have just one common category User no-4 for fluent speakers and one common category User no-N for native speakers of the Norwegian language, regardless of whether they write Bokmål or Nynorsk. --Verdlanco\talk 11:19, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * User nb-1
 * User nb-2
 * User nb-3
 * User nn-1
 * User nn-2
 * User nn-3

hgljkmlhkjlgkhjpfdlnlmhkmlll;gklhkkjkjkhhldl;lhkjkljk;llhjf'dkjkjlhh'lmkjjlBLPGLLGFLFPPLHKGPKH GFJK GHPJKHPKJHPJGH;'GF
N/bm.b;nlm[gv;nhg;hb'g.mnm;';g'h;h';m,,lm,n;;[kokjpty[tf[rlptojkpgfjhkj ntlkhogkhyb onkgl ,lkhmj —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.77.140.188 (talk) 12:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)