Category talk:Web 2.0

Category topics
Could someone please specify some criteria for what gets included here? I have some ideas, but I want to be sure. There seem to be both websites, software, and program codes listed here. So I would apprecoiate any possible help on this. thanks. --Sm8900 03:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

One side of the spectrum would be to eliminate all individual web sites from this category, for the same justification that all web "1.0" sites would not be listed under HTML. Truly notable or novel Web 2.0 sites (i.e. MySpace, Google Maps, etc.) may justify mention in the Web 2.0 article. Otherwise this just becomes a list of links Cander0000 19:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This category is meaningless. "web 2.0" is just another way of saying "we added more useless JavaScript". Pretty stupid. 85.78.102.212 (talk) 10:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Contents header
This entry prints out "funny" with a URL printing out for each letter in the header (Contents) rather than just the capital letters. Can anyone fix this?68.193.241.248 (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)