Category talk:Wikipedia policies and guidelines

can someone
can someone tell me if we are allowed to delete previously created pages that are no longer up-to date? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wend.anaya (talk • contribs) 20:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * See WP:DP. JJB 19:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Standardization
It appears that policy and guideline standards are nowhere near as clear-cut as I'd hoped. Much is needed and this tree, annotated with my first recommendations, only hints at the difficulty. The tree, of course, is itself not correctly sorted:

Wikipedia policies and guidelines (rename "Wikipedia pages about policies and guidelines")
 * Wikipedia proposals (flag many as historical)
 * Wikipedia proposals in brainstorming stage (delete, empty)
 * Wikipedia proposals in experimental stage (delete, empty)
 * Wikipedia rejected proposals (way overpopulated; add subcats roughly matching P&G breakdowns)
 * Wikipedia guidelines (delete proposals)
 * Wikipedia behavioral guidelines (delete proposals and add from COI)
 * Conflict of interest (depopulate and delete)
 * Wikipedia content guidelines (separate out style guidelines and make category clearer)
 * Wikipedia editing guidelines (fix some sortkeys)
 * Wikipedia naming conventions (separate out style guidelines)
 * Wikipedia notability guidelines (delete proposals and make sure category is full)
 * Wikipedia style guidelines (separate out naming conventions; create new category for MOS)
 * General style guidelines (combine into style guidelines, and define what's MOS and not)
 * Wikipedia official policy (exclude summaries; add subcats; put EVERY policy here and in 1 subcat)
 * Wikipedia conduct policy (add sortkeys)
 * Wikipedia content policy (add sortkeys)
 * Wikipedia deletion policy (add sortkeys)

At a loss of where to start and even where to post this for proper community attention, I will merely make this an action note for now. I may return some time later. JJB 19:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)