Category talk:Wikipedians interested in magic (illusion)

comments
You can't say "very old edits should not be reverted" because we don't use fait accompli here, and that's what that is. (Not sure of the best place to put this) ekips39  (talk)  06:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That editor isn't worth wasting time on, it's just a very obvious troll that most probably won't be here for long. Thomas.W talk 07:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably, but they've been here since 2008 so I'm not sure I'd expect anything. ekips39  (talk)  13:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noticed they've been here for several years, editing constructively. But what they did around 12 hours ago was very disruptive, and indicates that we either have an editor who has totally flipped out, or an account that has been compromised. Either way, one more day/night of such behaviour would probably be the end of that account. Thomas.W talk 13:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It seems you were right. ekips39  (talk)  22:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)