Category talk:World Heritage Sites in China

There is a dispute between two versions. To see the other version:, to compare:

Dispute
Instantnood added a template about this being disputed. Can you state a simple problem statement that encapsulates the dispute? SchmuckyTheCat 21:40, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * These are world heritage sites within mainland China. &mdash; Instantnood 06:21, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * I like, SchmuckyTheCat, fail to see what the problem is. The title is "World Heritage Sites in China", and makes no mention of political boundaries.  I don't think that there are any World Heritage Sites in Taiwan (probably because the Republic of China is not a UN member state), so we are spared that debate.  I believe the only possibly controversial item is Potala Palace.  With that exception, I don't think that anybody would dispute that all of these sites are within any definition of "China", regardless of who governs the territory.  Please specifically discuss what your problem is.


 * Anyways, since World Heritage Sites are defined by UNESCO, I'm not sure why there is anything to debate. This category merely documents a list compiled by another organization:  Jkiang 03:34, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * It is very nice that SchmuckyTheCat has added a notice and made the situation much clearer. However, I see no reason why it cannot be categorised under category:Mainland China, in addition to category:China . &mdash; Instantnood 10:47, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)