Draft:Contemporary jurisprudence

Contemporary Jurisprudence is a school of thoughts regarding jurisprudence which places greater emphasis on increasing the degree of democracy with a view to achieving absolute democratic status and increasing the effectiveness, transparency and the efficiency of the judicial system. In the following series of Jurisprudence, Contemporary Jurisprudence criticizes the current democratic system on the following grounds:


 * 1) The Parliament | Legislative Assembly | Governing body can never be considered an absolute representation of the State Republic. This is because the personal interests of the elected person can never be the same as those of the State Republic (according to Contemporary Jurisprudence). This means that, the current democratic system worldwide shall be declared null and void.
 * 2) The State Judicial System has been declared an organ of the State and must never be treated as an independent organ of the State. This means that current judicial systems Worldwide have been declared null and void.
 * 3) In present democratic system, only members of Parliament and the Legislature follow the election procedure, while other institutions (such as the Judiciary and the Bureaucracy) do not.

Rules of Contemporary Jurisprudence
The Father of Contemporary Jurisprudence, Mr. Deepak Sharma, proposed it be based on rules such as:

A. The dual representation of the democratic system - (Parliament and Society representation)

B. Dual representation of the Judicial System - (representation of the Judiciary and Society)

C. Centralized trial procedure of the Judicial System - Fair trial procedure (J.I.T)