Draft:Hellenistic Alexandria

Hellenistic Alexandria (Ancient Greek: ΑΛΕΞΆΝΔΡΕΙΑ, romanised: Alexándreia) refers to the city of Alexandria, Egypt during the time between its founding by Alexander the Great in 331 BCE and the annexation of the Ptolemaic Kingdom by the Republic of Rome in 30 BCE. This can be considered to be the city's golden age thanks to its status as the capital of the Ptolemaic Kingdom and the royal patronage that came as a result. Under the Ptolemies the city received most of its famous ancient landmarks, such as the Lighthouse of Alexandria, the Mouseion with its famed library and the tomb of Alexander the Great and grew to be the biggest and wealthiest city in the Mediterranean. According to some estimates, as many as 1 million people lived in Alexandria by the end of the Hellenistic period and it was the first ancient city whose organisation resembled that of a modern city. Dimitrios Pandermalis called it the first major urban centre of antiquity. It became the centre of Hellenistic culture and learning[] and was described in antiquity as "the first city of the civilised world". During subsequent eras, the cityscape changed considerably due to demolition and redevelopment projects, natural disasters, wars and revolts. As such, describing the Hellenistic Alexandrian cityscape is subject to a number of challenges and a matter of ongoing research and debate.[]

Name
The city of Alexandria was named after its founder, Alexander the Great. In official documents from the Hellenistic and Roman periods, it is often referred to as Alexandria near Egypt (Ancient Greek: ἈΛΕΞΆΝΔΡΕΙΑ Ἡ ΠΡῸΣ ΑἸΓΎΠΤΩ, romanised: Alexándreia hē pròs Aigúptōͅ, Latin: Alexandria ad Aegyptum), underlining its status as a nominally autonomous Greek polis which was considered administratively separate from the rest of Egypt. In ancient Egyptian, the city was called r-ꜥ-qd(y)t or Rhakote (Ancient Greek: ῬΑΚΩΤΙΣ, romanised: Rhakō̃tis, English: Rhakotis) which is thought to have been the name of a pre-Hellenistic Egyptian settlement on the site.

Contemporary
One of the most comprehensive early descriptions of Alexandria came from the historian Kallixeinos of Rhodes who lived in the city during the reign of Ptolemy IV and authored a four-volume work titled On Alexandria. Only small fragments of it have survived in the form of quotes and references in the works of later authors, such as Athenaios of Naucratis and Pliny the Elder. The latter, for example, credits Kallixeinos with an account of the Arsinoeion, a sanctuary dedicated to Arsinoe II by her brother-husband Ptolemy II, which apparently featured an enormous obelisk.[] Another important source is Polybios' 2nd-century BCE account of the events surrounding the deaths of Ptolemy IV and Arsinoe III and the subsequent political turmoil in the late 3rd and early 2nd century BCE which mentions several important buildings and landmarks and their relation to one another. Satyros of Callatis wrote a work titled On the demes of Alexandria, probably in the 3rd century BCE, explaining how the city's districts had received their names. Only fragments of it survive.[McKenzie] [...] Caesar's Civil War and the anonymous Roman account of the Alexandrian War provide some information on the cityscape in the middle of the 1st century BCE and relay some the damage it suffered during the Alexandrian War. [Polybios, Poseidippos, administrative documents, Diodoros of Sicily, Caesar]

Roman and Byzantine
An important description of the cityscape of ancient Alexandria comes from Strabo who lived in the city during the first decade of Roman rule over Egypt (though the exact dates of his stay there are unknown), only shortly after the end of the Hellenistic era. He mentions a number of important structures lining the Great Harbour and gives their rough position in relation to one another. Although his account is widely accepted as credible, the seemingly self-contradictory nature of parts of his description, as well as its ostensible incongruity with some archaeological findings has caused some debate and uncertainty among scholars as to its interpretation. Stefan Riedel has proposed that these issues can be resolved by assuming Strabo's description is given from the perspective of a passenger aboard a moving ship entering and moving through the harbour, rather than that of an observer standing in a fixed spot. [Philo of Alexandria]

Before 1810
[]

Modern Archaeology
The archaeological remains of Hellenistic Alexandria are generally in a poor state of preservation and difficult to access. Most Hellenistic-era buildings were destroyed or heavily damaged in ancient and Medieval times and their ruins plundered for building materials or torn down to make way for new construction. Some early excavations also damaged archaeological evidence through their lack of scientific methods and their poor record-keeping. Structures in proximity to the ancient coastline, as well as ancient harbourworks, were submerged as a result of natural disasters, soil subsidence and rising sea levels, while the remains of structures located further inland are today covered by the modern city which renders them largely inaccessible to archaeologists.

Some efforts have been made to use geophysics and electronic surveys to overcome this challenge. For example, Hesse et al. used seismic refraction to map the location and orientation of the ancient Heptastadion without the need for a physical excavation. Calliope Limneos-Papakosta used soil resistivity measurements to find what could be the remains of a large structure beneath the Old Jewish Cemetery (though it is impossible to identify or date this structure without excavating it). Most significantly, Franck Goddio and the IEASM have been able to reconstruct much of the ancient coastline and harbourworks thanks to a variety of techniques, including nuclear magnetic resonance magnetometers. Physical excavations are only possible in undeveloped areas, during construction works or underwater. Due to their poor condition, the exact nature of Hellenistic remains found during these excavations can often be difficult to identify. Several structures have been found over the decades whose precise function and appearance remain a mystery, such as the so-called Chantier Finney building in the Royal Quarter, the T-Building and South Building in the Sarapeion or more recently the foundations of a large public building in Shallalat Gardens.

Temples can sometimes be identified thanks to the ancient Egyptian practice of placing foundation plaques in their corners during construction, a custom which the Ptolemies appear to have adopted at least by the time of Ptolemy III. Such plaques were found in the Sarapeion, the Boubasteion, as well as in a temple dedicated to Sarapis, Isis, Ptolemy IV and Arsinoe III found along the main road.

Geography
Ancient Alexandria was located in the northwest of the Nile delta on a narrow isthmus bounded by the Mediterranean Sea in the north and Mareotis lake in the south. [ancient dimensions of the isthmus, of the lake, etc.] Off the coast lay the island of Pharos. Hesse has shown that, at the time of the city's foundation, there was a proto-tombolo connecting the island with the mainland about 1-2m below sea level. [cape lochias, antirhodos, reefs, natural harbours,...] [add new sub-heading for pre-Ptolemaic activity at the site?]

Pre-Hellenistic Settlements
[...]

Street Grid and Layout
Alexandria was laid out on a so-called Hippodamian grid with wide lengthwise and widthwise streets running at right angles towards one another, dividing the city into large rectangular city blocks. The grid follows a roughly NW-SE orientation. According to Diodoros of Sicily, it was oriented in this direction to catch the Etesian winds so as to provide its residents with a cool breeze in the Summer. The actual orientation of the grid as evidenced by archaeological remains is consistent with this assertion.

In the 19th century, Mahmoud Bey proposed a reconstruction of the ancient street grid based on his archaeological findings. The remains he encountered largely dated from the Roman and Byzantine periods but it is generally accepted among scholars that most of these later streets were probably built ontop of earlier Ptolemaic ones which is also supported by archaeological evidence. However, some streets do appear to have been added only in late Ptolemaic times, Roman times or Late Antiquity and direct evidence for the Hellenistic street layout in general is quite fragmentary. Nevertheless, Bey's grid is an important tool in reconstructing the Hellenistic cityscape. According to Bey's findings, the grid divided the city into regular blocks about 330 metres by 270 metres in size. During Hellenistic times, the streets are thought to have possessed a width of around 15 metres. The main lengthwise street, the Plateia (L1 in Bey's grid), measured at least a plethron (100 ancient feet, roughly 30 metres) in width according to Diodoros of Sicily and Strabo. It was lined with colonnades on either side. Excavations by [...] also revealed remains of a roughly 20-metre-wide street which is thought to be the main widthwise street (R1 in Bey's grid) that cut through the royal quarter and ran towards Cape Lochias. Within the blocks there seem to have been smaller irregularly laid-out streets and alleyways.

Starting from the Plateia northwards, Bey labelled the lengthwise streets L1-L4 and the lengthwise streets south of the Plateia L'2-L'4. Starting from the large street leading towards Cape Lochias westwards, he labelled the widthwise streets R1-R9 and the widthwise streets to the east R2bis-R4bis. This naming convention is still in use today. Some documents from the middle of the 3rd century BCE reference contemporary Alexandrian street names, including Arsinoe Our Lady of Mercy, Arsinoe who answers our prayers and Arsinoe of the Brazen House. However, it is unknown which specific streets these names refer to.

Based on the limited archaeological evidence for the Hellenistic street network, Abdo suggests that, for the majority of the Hellenistic period, Alexandria's streets may have been mainly surfaced with gravel (viae glareatae) or battered earth (viae terrenae) which would also help explain their elusiveness in the archaeological record. Hard stone pavements only started being introduced to Alexandria's streets in the 1st century BCE, possibly under Cleopatra VII in the aftermath of the Alexandrian War, and then slowly spread across the city throughout the Roman period.

According to both Philo and the Alexander Romance (among other sources), ancient Alexandria was divided into five quarters named after the first five letters of the Greek alphabet: Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilon. It is unknown when exactly this naming convention was introduced, which part of the city bore which of these letters and where exactly their borders lay. However, according to a papyrus from 13 BCE, the Delta Quarter contained the Kibotos harbour, which was located in the northwest of the city. The Alexander Romance purports that the letters corresponded to the phrase Ἀλεξάνδρος βασιλεύς γένος Δίος ἔκτισε πόλιν ἀείμνηστον (English: "Alexander the king, the Zeus-born, founded an ever-memorable city"). As the letter Beta stands for the word king in this phrase, the Beta Quarter is thus sometimes identified with the Royal Quarter. Along with the Royal Quarter, an Egyptian Quarter is mentioned in ancient sources which occupied the area around the Sarapeion but it is unknown which of the five letters was assigned to it.[] The area immediately west of the Royal Quarter has yielded evidence of elite Greek residences.[] Philo indicates that Alexandria's Jewish population was scattered throughout the city in Ptolemaic times (thus implying that there was no Jewish quarter as such), though there were apparently two parts of town in which it was particularly concentrated, one of which was the Delta Quarter.

Water Supply
Alexandria's water supply initially relied exclusively on ground water collected from the sandstone aquifers beneath the city via a dynamic hydraulic system made up of a complex network of well shafts, subhorizontal channels (hyponomoi) and cisterns carved into the bedrock. The oldest excavated parts of this network date to the 3rd century BCE, though Hairy speculates that the basic technique may date back to the site's pre-Hellenistic settlers. During Mahmoud Bey's time an estimated 700 cisterns existed in the city. Most of these had been either constructed or enlarged during Byzantine and Islamic times but Hellenistic examples have been discovered during excavations. These were generally smaller and of irregular shape. Evidence has also been found for underground drains and sewers dating to the Ptolemaic period. It is unknown exactly how the system functioned but it appears to have involved the use of lifting mechanisms, such as saqiyahs, and, according to ancient sources, it supplied private homes in Alexandria with direct access to running water.

The water from the aquifers was eventually supplemented with water from the Nile which reached the city via the [...]km long Canal of Alexandria (also referred to as the Schedia Canal and the Menelaos Canal, among others). Reportedly constructed during the reign of Ptolemy I to faciliate ship transport between the city and the Egyptian hinterland, the canal connected the city to the Canopic branch of the Nile. Its route is thought to have roughly matched that of the modern Mahmoudiyah Canal, though in Ptolemaic times it flowed into Mareotis Lake instead of running along its northern shore. The island of Pharos was supplied with water via an aqueduct on the Heptastadion.

[Find the Mathieu Giaime paper on the canal and Kibotos Harbour.] [Talk about the water supply of individual residences]

City Walls and Fortifications
See also: Hellenistic fortifications

According to Tacitus, the city walls were completed under Ptolemy I. The exact course and appearance of these original walls is uncertain. Mahmoud Bey's proposed wall perimeter is generally thought to be a relatively accurate representation of the city's Roman-era fortifications. [describe them] In how far the course of the Ptolemaic city walls matched that of the Roman ones, however, is uncertain.

Ancient sources suggest that Alexandria possessed two eastern walls by at least 30 BCE. Some scholars take this to mean that the city's original eastern boundary was extended at some point after its foundation. The existence of Ptolemaic-era necropoleis in the eastern part of Bey's city perimeter is sometimes seen as further indication of Bey's eastern wall being a later extension as Greeks traditionally buried their dead outside the city walls. Accordingly, Riedel (similarly to Botti and Grimm) suggests that the original eastern wall probably lay between Bey's streets R2bis and R3bis, to the west of those necropoleis. However, McKenzie notes that intramural burials did occur in the Hellenistic world, especially in Asia Minor, and that the location of burials can thus not necessarily be seen as proof of a change in city boundaries. In his 2nd century CE work Leucippe and Clitophon, Achilles Tatius describes his protagonist entering Alexandria through the eastern gate, walking down the colonnaded Plateia for a few stadia and then setting eyes upon a "second city" and another colonnaded street which cut the Plateia at right angles.

A small stretch of the old Arab city wall which incorporates an earlier Ptolemaic fortification wall can still be seen in the Shallalat Gardens to the east of street R1. Its original date and function are uncertain but the building technique employed is typically Hellenistic. Chugg interprets it as part of the original city wall, Riedel thinks it too far west for that and suggests it may have been part of a military facility housing the armoury or barracks. Some scholars, such as Pensabene and Adriani, have interpreted it as remains of a fortification wall that encircled the entire royal quarter, though Riedel points out that there is no mention of such a wall in ancient sources.

Strabo mentions the existence of an akra (citadel) on Cape Lochias which was part of the royal quarter. Polybius also mentions an akra which apparently included a prison. This is often assumed to be identical with the Lochias akra, though Polybius doesn't specify its location which means he could theoretically be referring to a different, second akra. Remains of a large, fortified gate were found south of Cape Lochias, around 80m north of Bey's street L4, cutting across Bey's street R1. This gate apparently went out of use at some point in the 1st century BCE. It has been interpreted as both a part of the Lochias akra and a part of hypothetical fortifications of the inner palace area mentioned by Strabo (which lay outside the akra), possibly even the chrematistikos pylon mentioned by Polybius. However, at this point there is no hard evidence to prove or disprove any of these theories.

[Akra Lochias. Possibility of another Akra. Palace fortifications. Gates.]

The Great Harbour
The Great Harbour (Ancient Greek: μέγᾰς λῐμήν, romanised: mégas limḗn; Latin: Portus Magnus) was located in the north of the city and bounded by the Heptastadion and the island of Pharos in the west and Cape Lochias in the east. Thanks to both Strabo's relatively detailed description and the archaeological work done by the IEASM under Franck Goddio, its Ptolemaic layout can be reconstructed with some certainty. In its eastern half lay the royal harbour which, according to Strabo, could be closed off, the Poseidion promontory with a temple to Poseidon upon it, as well as the so-called Timoneion which Strabo attributes to Mark Anthony. West of the Poseidion lay the small island of Antirhodos which had its own small harbour. The island contained a small royal palace measuring roughly 23 by 68 metres and a temple to Isis, both dated to the 1st century BCE.

Goddio places the Hellenistic Emporion opposite the Isle of Antirhodos in between the Poseideion and the later site of the Caesareion (Port IV on the map). Riedel follows him in this but suggests that it also continued on the other side of the Caesareion complex. However, Abdo argues for a localisation of the Emporion exclusively to the West of the Caesareion and suggests that Port IV was the private royal harbour "dug by the hand of man" described by Strabo. This disagreement is caused by Strabo's contradictory description which, on the one hand, suggests that the Emporion was located in between the Caesareion and the ship-houses by the Heptastadion (supporting Abdo's hypothesis) but, on the other hand, also states that the Poseideion projected from the Emporion like an elbow (supporting Goddio's hypothesis).[]

[Western half of the Great Harbour, more detail on the reefs, Pharos island, Eastern harbours in more detail]

Eunostos and Kibotos
[...]

Mareotis
[...]

The Royal Quarter
The Royal Quarter, also referred to as Basileia (Ancient Greek: βασίλεια, romanised: basíleia), Beta Quarter, Broucheion or Palace Quarter was located in and around the eastern half of the Great Harbour in the north or northeast of the ancient city. It included the entirety of Cape Lochias and extended southwards and westwards from its base, though its precise extent is unknown. According to Strabo the Royal Quarter occupied a fourth or maybe even a third of the entire city area. (Riedel suggests that it included the Emporion mentioned by Strabo and that it extended as far west as street R4 or R5 and as far south as the Plateia. ) The Royal Quarter included a multitude of public, religious, administrative and residential buildings. Strabo mentions a large number of royal residences in the area which had been successively constructed by different Ptolemaic monarchs, though Riedel notes that the majority of royal palace structures were probably completed by the late 3rd or early 2nd century BCE. One notable exception being the palace on the island of Antirhodos which has been dated to the 1st century BCE. Large parts of the quarter would have likely been taken up by gardens. Inge Nielsen draws parallels to the vast paradeisos of the Achaemenid palaces which appear to have had a significant influence on Hellenistic palace architecture. Some Roman frescoes of "Alexandrian landscapes" show idyllic park-like surroundings. Excavations have found evidence of planting pits in the area of the royal quarter featuring deposits of Nile mud which were presumably placed there as fertiliser. These gardens would have included diaitai (pavilions or gazebos, probably used as private dining rooms) and ornamental water features.

The Royal Quarter also housed the city's Great Theatre which was connected to the palaces via a vaulted corridor called the Syrinx, the Mouseion with its famous library, the Soma housing the tomb of Alexander, the royal treasury, temples, accomodations for official guests, a zoo, a prison, an artificial stream called the Maiandros (alt. sp. Meandros or Maeandros), the armoury, accomodations for soldiers, fortifications and the royal harbour.

Some Ptolemaic buildings in the royal quarter appear to have been aligned strictly along the cardinal directions, while others were aligned along the orientation of the street grid. Abdo proposes that the entire royal quarter may have initially been laid out along cardinal (i.e. solar) directions due to Alexander the Great's identification as a son of Ra (the Egyptian sun god), while Riedel suggests that these deviations from the street grid may have simply been the result of the quarter's layout being influenced by the coastline.

The archaeological remains of upper-class residences have been found in areas that either belonged to or were immediately adjacent to the royal quarter. These date from the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE [check that none of them were 2nd century BCE].[] In the 4th century CE, Ammianus Marcellinus remarked that the "Bruchion", which, according to him, was largely destroyed when emperor Aurelian retook the city from the Palmyrenes in 272 CE, "had long been the abode of distinguished men".

The major surviving accounts mentioning and describing the Ptolemaic Royal Quarter come from Strabo and Polybius. [...]

The Egyptian Quarter
The Egyptian Quarter, also referred to as Rhakotis, was located in the west of Alexandria. It is unknown how far it extended towards the east. According to Strabo it lay south of the western docks of the Great Harbour. The district would have been dominated by the Sarapeion complex looming above the surrounding town from atop its rocky plateau. South of the Sarapeion stood the Lageion, a large hippodrome or stadium named for Lagos, the father of Ptolemy I.

The Island of Pharos
The island of Pharos lay 1.26 km off the coast of Alexandria.[] In the Hellenistic period, it was apparently not considered part of Alexandria proper. The island was connected to the mainland via the Heptastadion, a long causeway that separated the Great Harbour in the east from the harbour of Eunostos in the west. Bridges at either end of the Heptastadion connected the two harbours. An aqueduct on the Heptastadion supplied the island with water.[] The island's most notable structure was the Lighthouse of Alexandria which stood on a rocky outcrop off its eastern tip. It was constructed in the beginning of the 3rd century BCE. According to Arrian's Anabasis of Alexander written in the 2nd century CE, Alexander the Great ordered Kleomenes to build two lavish shrines dedicated to Hephaestion, one on the island of Pharos and one in Alexandria proper. Beginning in the 2nd century BCE there is evidence for a cemetery on Pharos in the area of modern-day Anfoushy. At least by the middle of the first century BCE, the island was also home to a population of [several thousand] people, though the events of the Alexandrian War apparently laid waste to the island and it had still not been repopulated by the time Strabo lived in the city. Roman-era coins showing Isis Pharia next to the Lighthouse have sometimes been interpreted as evidence for a temple to Isis existing on the island of Pharos. However, it is unknown whether such a temple really existed and, if so, when it was constructed.

Temples and Shrines
According to Strabo, the city was "full of public and sacred structures". Arrian claims that Alexander himself marked out the locations of many of the city's temples which were dedicated to both Greek and Egyptian gods. He specifically mentions the temple of Isis but it is uncertain which temples exactly traced their construction to the foundation of the city.

The earliest temple found in the archaeological record is the Boubasteion, dedicated to the Egyptian goddess Bastet, which dates to the pre-Ptolemaic period [double-check that] but appears to have been renovated under Ptolemy III. The site of the Sarapeion, which contained temples to Sarapis and Harpocrates (as well as other as yet unidentified buildings), also shows early use for religious purposes that predate its redevelopment by Ptolemy III. Other temples known from the archaeological record include a temple to Sarapis, Isis, Ptolemy IV and Arsinoe III, which was apparently located south of the Plateia [more precise location], a temple to Isis located on the isle of Antirhodos and dated to the 1st century BCE and a temple to Poseidon located on the Poseideion promontory.

Historical accounts also mention temples and sanctuaries to Demeter, Isis (presumably distinct from the one on Antirhodos), the Muses, Leto, the Dioskouroi and Tyche (McKenzie and Gibson speculate that the latter may have been a Pantheon of sorts). Later sources also mention a temple to Dionysos which may date back to Hellenistic times (in any case, a Dionysian temple can be assumed to have existed in Hellenistic Alexandria due to the god's status as a Ptolemaic patron deity) and Roman-era coins imply the existence of temples to Athena and Nilos (which, too, may or may not date back to the Hellenistic period).

Additionally, there was a multitude of shrines and altars, such as a shrine to Homer built under Ptolemy IV, a grotto shrine to Pan built beneath a large artificial hill (the Paneion), two shrines to Hephaestion and altars to Alexander and the Agathos Daimon. The Ptolemies also established sanctuaries for their dynastic cult, such as the Arsinoeion dedciated to Arsinoe II, the Berenikeion dedicated to Berenice II and the Sema dedicated to the cult of Alexander. Temples to other gods such as Zeus and Hermes are likely to have existed, though they are not mentioned in historical accounts.

Hellenistic Alexandria would have also housed synagogues which were established by its sizeable Jewish community. In fact, the earliest known examples of synagogues come from Hellenistic Egypt.[] A dedicatory inscription from a synagogue dated to the reign of Ptolemy III was found in the town of Schedia near Alexandria. In Alexandria itself a dedicatory inscription from a synagogue dating to roughly the second half of the 2nd century BCE was found in the Hadra district. It is unknown how many synagogues there were in ancient Alexandria and where they were located.[]

Necropoleis
The earliest known cemeteries in Alexandria were established towards the east. These include the tombs at Hadra, Sidi Gaber, Shatby and tombs I and [IV] at Moustapha Pasha. Whether the cemeteries of Hadra and Shatby were located within or outside the city walls at the time of their construction is a matter of ongoing debate (see City Walls and Fortifications). During the 2nd century BCE another cemetery appears to have been established on the island of Pharos at Anfoushy. During the 1st century BCE, the early eastern cemeteries were swallowed up by the growing city and new cemeteries were established to the west at Wardian, Gabbari and Mafrousa. In Strabo's time the suburb containing these western cemeteries was simply called Nekropolis. According to his description it contained many gardens and groves, as well as embalming houses.[]

Visual Arts
[intro]

Architecture
Though most buildings in Hellenistic Alexandria were built in a fundamentally Greek style, Alexandrian architecture did display a large array of unique innovations and stylistic idiosyncracies many of which were at least indirectly inspired by the architectures of Achaemenid Persia and Pharaonic Egypt. Among them were unique forms of the Corinthian order and new baroque shapes and arrangements of classical architectural elements which later significantly influenced Roman architecture. Additionally, at least some structures in Alexandria were apparently built in traditional Egyptian or Graeco-Egyptian styles. The Doric and Ionic orders employed in Alexandria showed little deviation from the established architectural canon of the Aegean and developments elsewhere in the Hellenistic world. Surviving architectural fragments show that Alexandrian architects liberally combined Doric and Ionic elements (e.g. mixing Doric and Ionic mouldings on the same entablature) which was common Hellenistic practice. Uniquely Alexandrian is the later combination of the Doric and Ionic orders with the Corinthian order and the inclusion of traditional Egyptian elements. For example, Corinthian capitals appear to have been paired with Doric entablatures on a regular basis in Alexandria (a prominent example being Ptolemy III's temple of Sarapis in the Sarapeion), something that was not commonly done elsewhere in the Hellenistic world. The use of Corinthian capitals on building exteriors was a major innovation of the Hellenistic era. One of the earliest surviving examples of the Corinthian order being employed as a main order on a monumental exterior facade is the propylon of the Sanctuary of the Great Gods on Samothrace which was sponsored by Ptolemy II. The earliest known example in Alexandria is on the aforementioned temple of Sarapis in the Sarapeion. Corinthian columns were used very liberally in Ptolemaic architecture (Evaristo Breccia noted that, among archaeological finds from Alexandria, Corinthian elements far outnumbered those of any other order, especially on smaller edifices ) and as their precise composition hadn't yet been standardised in the Hellenistic period, Alexandrian architects were free to experiment with it which led to a large variety in the shape and ornamentation of Alexandrian Corinthian capitals which modern historians have divided into four distinct types. Type I of these Alexandrian types appears to represent the first occurence of the so-called Normal Corinthian capital which was later adapted and standardised by the Romans.

Alexandrian Corinthian columns sometimes featured acanthus leaf column bases which were inserted above the traditional attic base. These are attested from the 3rd century BCE onwards. McKenzie thinks it likely that these acanthus bases were inspired by traditional Egyptian columns. While the architecture of the city was predominantly Greek in appearance, the Ptolemies moved large numbers of Pharaonic-era sculpture and obelisks from different sites in Egypt (especially from Heliopolis and Memphis) to Alexandria and also erected statues of themselves sculpted in traditional Pharaonic or Graeco-Egyptian styles to decorate these Greek architectural spaces.[]

However, some temples in Alexandria do seem to have been built in the Egyptian or Graeco-Egyptian style featuring large pylon gates. In the 19th century, remnants of a temple to Sarapis, Isis, Ptolemy IV and Arsinoe III south of the Plateia were described as being Graeco-Egyptian in style (though they were not properly recorded). A temple to Isis featuring an Egyptian pylon gate is shown on some Roman-era Alexandrian coins.[] The Ptolemaic-era temple of Osiris at Taposiris Magna west of Alexandria combined an Egyptian-style temple enclosure and pylon gate with a Hellenistic temple building.[] Egyptian-style architectural fragments (some dating from Pharaonic times and reused, some sculpted in the Graeco-Roman period) have also been found in Alexandria, such as door jambs and papyriform columns, though it is often uncertain whether these were (re-)erected during Hellenistic or Roman times.[] In the area of the ancient Cape Lochias, the monolithic top half of a small pylon was found underwater. (This has been connected by excavators to a temple of Isis but there's apparently no hard evidence to support that assertion.)[]

The tombs of the Moustapha Pasha necropolis, the earliest of which are generally dated to the 3rd century BCE, replace the pediment in their Doric entablatures with attic walls, a typically Egyptian feature. Moustapha Pasha tomb I also features small Egyptian sphinx statuettes in its court.

During the reign of Ptolemy IV in the late 3rd to early 2nd century BCE, Alexandrian architects appear to have begun using Egyptian elements with increasing frequency.[] His palace barge, the Thalamegos, is described by Athenaios (who relies on an account by Kallixeinos) as having had a dining room in what Athenaios calls an Egyptian style, featuring bulbous columns built from alternating black and white drums with Egyptian lotus and palm capitals. McKenzie notes that the interiors of the Thalamegos do not appear to have mixed Egyptian and Hellenistic styles but rather employed one or the other on a per-room basis. A similar decorational scheme to that of the Thalamegos' Egyptian dining room survives in the Anfoushy Necropolis where some walls are decorated with a black-and-white chequer pattern (meant to imitate faience tiles), alabaster imitations and traditional Egyptian crown motifs; two pilasters are painted with horizontal black-and-white stripes. (At Anfoushy, this decorational scheme dates to some time after the 2nd century BCE, possibly even after the 1st century BCE and was applied over an earlier Greek-style layer.)

The "Egyptian oecus" described by Vitruvius with lower aisles, an inner colonnade and a higher nave featuring clerestory windows may have, as the name suggests, also originated in Alexandria following either native Egyptian or Persian examples. It corresponds with both an ancient description of a banqueting tent erected by Ptolemy II and a room in the Ptolemaic-era Palazzo delle Colonne in Ptolemais [and may have been the ancestor of the Roman basilica].

Materials and Construction
Local Alexandrian limestone was used liberally in ancient Alexandrian building projects. However, its grainy, porous texture makes it a poor-quality stone. As a result, Alexandrian limestone structures were usually coated in stucco which was subsequently painted. Other stone, such as granite, basalt, alabaster and high quality limestone had to be brought from other parts of the Ptolemaic kingdom, whereas marble had to be imported from other parts of the Hellenistic world. Pink Aswan granite was a popular choice for columns and architectural elements. Prestigious buildings would have featured various kinds of marble. Lucan mentions marble walls in the palaces and Athenaios relates that the Thalamegos featured columns made of Indian marble. Alabaster is mentioned as having been used for some floors in the royal palaces and was also used for the interior of an early tumulus tomb made for an unidentified high-status person. Some other surviving tombs such as the ones at Anfoushy feature painted alabaster imitations, as well as imitations of faience tiles.

While ancient Egypt did produce wood locally, indigenous trees could not provide high-quality timber of large size. Such timber needed to be imported and was thus expensive. The Ptolemies made concerted efforts to expand the country's wood production, however, this production was highly regulated and managed by the state and seems to have been mainly intended for the building of warships. According to the author of the Alexandrian Wars, writing in the 1st century BCE, most Alexandrian buildings included no wooden joinery and were instead built of masonry with arched ceilings and roughcast or tile roofs. (Arched ceilings, usually of a segmental nature, are also frequently found in Alexandrian hypogeum tombs. Terracotta tiles have been found during excavations.) However, he also mentions that the roofs of public buildings such as gymnasia and stoas did contain wooden beams. Lucan's description of the interior of one of the royal palaces emphasises its liberal use of expensive Meroitic wood, not just for decoration but also in a structural capacity. Kallixeinos' description of the Thalamegos also points out the expensive cypress and cedar wood used in its interior.

In sanctuaries and the royal palaces, gemstones were also reportedly used as both a decorative and structural material. Lucan mentions architectural elements made of agate "standing on their own accord" and Pliny the Elder reports that the Arsinoeion featured a greater-than-lifesize statue of Arsinoe made from peridot.

[types of paints, stucco or plaster, check Riedel, etc. for additional stone types, ivory, gold/silver, mudbrick, types of wood,...]

Residential Architecture
The residences of Alexandria's upper classes appear to have been typically Hellenistic in their layout. Rooms were grouped around a central peristyle (or several adjacent peristyles) which was accessible through the main entrance and which probably contained gardens and possibly water features. Unlike Roman houses, Hellenistic houses did not possess atria. They often featured two stories [with the ground floor mainly housing dining rooms, the kitchen, pantry and slave and servant quarters and the upper story containing bedrooms]. There is no concrete evidence for houses with more than two stories. According to Winter, the peristyle courts of Alexandrian residential buildings were probably mainly built in the Doric order, at least during the early Ptolemaic period (later, in the 1st century BCE, the Palazzo delle Colonne in Ptolemais combined Ionic capitals with a Doric entablature in the lower story of the peristyle and employed the Corinthian order in the upper story). He bases this assumption on the surviving hypogea of Ptolemaic-era tombs which he argues were designed to mirror the residential architecture of the time. [Residential architecture, in turn, probably followed trends set by royal palace architecture.] Archaeological finds at other sites which were under Ptolemaic influence, such as Ptolemais in Lybia and Nea Paphos in Cyprus, further suggest the use of so-called Rhodian peristyles in Alexandrian residential architecture (in which the columns on one or two sides of a peristyle court are taller than the others), which Winter thinks may have actually originated in Alexandria. Vaulted ceilings also seem to have been a common feature. The interiors were decorated with frescoes mimmicking the rich materials used in Ptolemaic palaces, such as alabaster, wood and marble, similar to the so-called First Style of Pompeii. Archaeological evidence suggests that at least some upper-class residences in Alexandria were directly connected to the city's fresh and waste water system. [Shops and workshops. Andron/gynaikeion]

According to Winter, large Hellenistic metropoleis such as Alexandria must have possessed an equivalent to Roman insulae, i.e. some form of multi-family housing units, to house their large lower-class populations. However, there is no evidence of these in either the documentary or the archaeological record and so both their existence and their exact nature and appearance are entirely speculative.

Funerary Architecture
Alexandrian tombs were generally subterranean and carved into the bedrock. The earliest examples were simple burial shafts or pits with above-ground funerary monuments (stelai, altars or naiskoi) placed above them. Starting in the early 3rd century BCE there is evidence for hypogeum tombs. These could either be constructed for a single individual, a single family or be of a communal nature. Monumental tombs can be divided into two general types: the oikos type and the peristyle type. The oikos type followed traditional Macedonian examples which were based on the megaron and was defined by a linear layout. The peristyle type appears to have been modelled after Alexandrian residential architecture with its rooms arranged around a pseudo-peristyle court. Both types usually featured a small burial chamber containing one or sometimes two stone sarcophagi which were carved and painted to look like klinai according to Macedonian tradition. In front of the burial chamber lay a vestibule whose shape and size could differ considerably from tomb to tomb. The vestibule often contained stone benches along the walls. Open courts were placed in front of the vestibules in both peristyle and oikos tombs but the courts of peristyle tombs always featured engaged columns. Sometimes a portico was added in between the vestibule and the court. In peristyle tombs additional rooms were placed behind some or all other sides of the court. Many tombs contained small altars either in the court or in the vestibule. A common feature of Alexandrian tombs are loculi, small rectangular compartments carved into the walls to hold human remains. These were closed using so-called loculus slabs which often featured carved and/or painted mythological scenes or portraits of the deceased. In communal [Describe different types of hypogeum tombs.][The 2nd century BCE saw the introduction of gallery tombs which]

Sacral Architecture
In the Hellenistic period, architects throughout the Greek world began putting greater emphasis on the temenos and propylon of a sanctuary at the expense of the actual temple structure. As a result, Hellenistic temples were often smaller than their classical counterparts. Temple precincts were frequently enclosed with stoas, often on all sides. Ptolemy III's Sarapeion in Alexandria is a good example of this as it features a large, rectangular temenos enclosed on all four sides by stoas, two propylea and a relatively small temple structure (along with a small temple to Harpocrates and other, unidentified structures). Emphasis was also put on the view that was afforded visitors upon entering a sanctuary's temenos which often resulted in the front facades of temples being given special attention. Most Greek sanctuaries surviving from the Hellenistic period were not aligned along a single centre axis (as was later often the case in Roman sanctuaries). Again, Ptolemy III's Sarapeion provides an Alexandrian example, as it follows an asymmetrical plan with the temple of Sarapis standing to the side of the enclosure's central axis and both propylea being located in one of the long sides of the enclosure, so that the temple would have been approached from the side. (When the Sarapeion was rebuilt during the Roman era, it was enlarged to allow for a more symmetrical layout.) However, some early examples of axial alignment in Greek-style sanctuaries do survive from Ptolemaic Egypt, such as the temple of Ptolemy III and Berenice II at Hermopolis Magna and the temple of Osiris at Taposiris Magna[] (which combines a Greek-style temple with a traditional Egyptian enclosure and pylon gate), both dating from the 3rd century BCE. It has been suggested that such axially aligned sanctuaries, probably inspired by traditional Egyptian temple design, may have also existed in Alexandria.

[...]

Sculpture
[While Alexandrian architects leaned heavily into their new baroque form language, Alexandrian sculptors seem to have favoured classisising and Egyptianising styles for their works, as opposed to the baroque sculpture prized by the Ionians. ]

Hellenistic-era Greek sculpture found in Alexandria exhibits a multitude of different stylistic influences. From the 3rd century BCE several sculpture fragments survive that show clear Praxitelean influence in their stylistic features which may have been brought to Alexandria by Attic sculptors who are known to have been active in the city soon after its foundation. Other Alexandrian sculpture from the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE exhibits a more progressive style in the traditions of Scopas and Lysippos. However, Alexandrian sculptors don't appear to have adopted the exaggerated baroque conventions of their Pergamene contemporaries. A common feature of Alexandrian sculpture is the Praxitelean soft, "dream-like" rendering of flesh and facial features contrasting with sharp, roughly carved hair. The exaggerated degree to which some Alexandrian works employ this technique has been described as impressionist and compared to the Renaissance painting techniques of sfumato and morbidezza. Long necks and pronounced neck folds are also typical of Alexandrian sculpture. Portraits tend to be at least partially idealised which often hampers attempts to securely identify their subjects. It must be noted that there was considerable artistic and cultural exchange between Alexandria and other parts of the Hellenistic world, especially those that were part of the Ptolemaic Empire or that were within the Ptolemaic sphere of influence, such as Kyrenaika, Cyprus, the Dodekanese or Karia. It was not uncommon for sculptors to move between these regions and there are known examples of single sculptor workshops operating across several of these territories. As a result, there is considerable overlap in style, technique and iconography between sculptures produced and erected in these different parts of the Hellenistic world and the techniques and features mentioned, although typical of Alexandrian sculpture, are not exclusive to it. [As there was no native Egyptian source of marble, Alexandrian sculptors were economical in their use of it. As a result, a lot of Alexandrian sculpture was composite in nature, so-called acroliths, mixing materials such as marble, granite, stucco, limestone, bronze, gold, ivory, etc. in the same statue but there are many examples of monolithic pieces, as well.][] According to Margarete Bieber, Ptolemaic-era Egyptian acroliths often used marble for flesh and painted stucco for clothing, hair and accessories. [Polychromy - photo of the bust of Berenice]

[Historical references to specific pieces include a description of the statue inventory of the Tychaion (which, due to the motifs described is thought to be Ptolemaic, though the description dates to the Roman period), coin depictions and copies of the Sarapeion's chryselephantine cult statue of Sarapis, mentions of large mechanical statues paraded through the streets of Alexandria during Ptolemy II's Ptolemaia festival]

Starting in the 2nd century BCE, Alexandrian gem carvers began engraving details into the eyes of subjects, a practice that later made its way into some Alexandrian sculpture, as well, such as a miniature composite statue of Alexander the Great dated to the 1st century BCE or 1st century CE, now in the Brooklyn Museum, (possibly a copy of a larger sculpture by Lysippos) which Bieber describes as being "rococo" in style.

Ancient descriptions and copies of several lost sculptures from Hellenistic Alexandria have survived. Athenaios' description of the Thalamegos (based on an original account by Kallixeinos from the 3rd century BCE) mentions that one of the ship's banqueting rooms featured an apse in the shape of a gilded, bejewelled Dionysian grotto that housed portrait statues of the royal family made in Parian marble.

A 2nd-century BCE papyrus mentions plans for a statue of Ptolemy VI made entirely of gold to be erected in Alexandria.

Roman copies survive of the seated chryselephantine cult statue of Sarapis housed in the Alexandrian Sarapeion. The popular Roman statue type of a reclining Neilos is also thought by some scholars to have originated in Hellenistic Alexandria, though there is no conclusive evidence for where or when the type originated. [Pliny the Elder describes a large version of the Neilos type made of Egyptian basalt which, during his time, stood in the Templum Pacis in Rome and which has been suggested by some to be the Hellenistic original.]

Pliny the Elder mentions a statue of Janus Pater which Augustus took from Alexandria and brought to Rome to be donated to the Temple of Janus at the Forum Holitorium. While it was variably assigned to Praxiteles and Skopas, it was probably actually an Alexandrian work from the early Hellenistic period depicting Hermes Dikephalos. He also relates the claim that Ptolemy II had a 4 cubits high statue of Arsinoe II carved from peridot and subsequently erected in the Arsinoeion (1 Egyptian royal cubit equals roughly 52.5cm).

A 4th or 5th century CE account of the Tychaion by an unknown author includes descriptions of its statuary which is thought to date to the Hellenistic period. It included: a statue of "the Founder" (presumed to be either Alexander or Ptolemy I) atop things that nourished the city, carrying a "memorial of Soter"; a statue showing a Nikai-flanked Tyche crowning Gaia who, in turn, was crowning Alexander the Great; a statue of a nude man carrying a model of heaven in his left hand, his right hand "prepared for everything"; a statue of a man philosophising on a chair. Other statues mentioned in this account but not described are: a statue of Charis, a statue featuring a laurel crown, twelve statues of various gods (presumably the twelve Olympians) and bronzes of esteemed Ptolemaic kings.

Mosaics
The earliest mosaics found in Alexandria are dated to the late fourth and early third century BCE. Just like earlier examples from Pella and Olynthos, they were first produced using round pebbles in black, white and red. An example is preserved in the oldest mosaic found in Alexandria, a late fourth century BCE mosaic floor of an andron in the so-called House of the Rosette which features a rosette motif on a simple background made up of black and white pebbles. However, in the course of the third century BCE, squared tesserae in a greater variety of colours came into use both in Alexandria and in other parts of the Hellenistic world. At first they were employed in combination with pebbles, such as in the Alexandrian examples of the partially preserved so-called Warrior Mosaic showing a warrior or hunter holding a shield and spear and the so-called Stag Hunt mosaic which depicts three Erotes on a stag hunt, both from the area of the Palace Quarter. By the end of the third century BCE, pebbles had been phased out completely in favour of tesserae. This allowed for the development of so-called opus vermiculatum mosaics which used especially small tesserae in a multitude of colours to create more detailed and more life-like images. Alexandrian examples of this type include two second century BCE mosaics from the Palace Quarter, one showing a dog and the other two wrestlers engaged in a fight. However, the possibly oldest known opus vermiculatum mosaic comes from Thmuis, Egypt, and depicts a Ptolemaic queen (commonly identified as Berenice II but possibly actually Arsinoe II) wearing a costume with naval motifs. It is thought to have been executed by Alexandrian craftspeople, possibly after an original from Alexandria, and is generally dated to the late third century BCE.

Painting
[...]

It is thought that the Nile Mosaic of Praeneste (about half of which survives in a heavily restored form) is a copy of a monumental Ptolemaic painting, possibly commissioned by Ptolemy II to commemorate his expeditions up the Nile. The bottom right corner is generally thought to depict Alexandria with its harbour and a group of Macedonian soldiers drinking in front of a building featuring a colonnaded portico and a typically Alexandrian segmental pediment and roof. It has been suggested that the mosaic itself may have been laid by Alexandrian craftspeople.

Jewellery and Luxury Goods
[...]

Population
Alexandria is generally considered to have been the largest of all ancient Greek cities, though the only hard population number we have is one reported by Diodoros Sikolos sometime between 60-56 BCE. At this time the city had 300,000 free residents. [The exact definition of free residents in this context is unknown, as is the number of "unfree" residents. It is conceivable that the term only referred to male Greek citizens but also that it referred to all residents who were not enslaved. There is also debate over whether inhabitants of the suburbs and surrounding areas were included in the count.] As a result of this uncertainty, estimates for the city's total population in the Hellenistic era vary wildly, ranging from 350,000 all the way up to 1,000,000 people.

The city was home to a large plurality of ethnicities but the three biggest groups were Greeks, Egyptians and Jews. Greeks made up the bulk of the upper classes (though some Jewish people gained great influence at court during the time of Ptolemy VI and Cleopatra II) and Greek was the common language. A passage from Theokritos' mime Idyll XV, set during the reign of Ptolemy II, betrays some of the tensions that may have existed between these groups. In it, two Greek women living in Alexandria praise Ptolemy II for having made the streets safer. They say that before he took office there were "villains sneaking up to murder us in the streets [...] in the good old Egyptian style", then go on to claim that all Egyptians are "thorough-paced rogues" and "queer".

3 Macabees claims that Ptolemy IV unsuccessfully tried to murder Alexandria's Jews by rounding them up in the hippodrome and having drunken elephants trample them to death. However, the historicity of this account is highly disputed. Josephus describes a similar event but places it in the reign of Ptolemy VIII Physcon who he claims was angered by Jewish support for his rival Cleopatra II. The earliest reliable attestations of widespread anti-semitism in Alexandria date to [the Roman era]. [Fraser Ptolemaic Alexandria; Delia Alexandrian Citizenship]

Administration
Alexandria was set up as an autonomous Greek polis with its inhabitants divided into citizens and non-citizens. Citizenship was hereditary and reserved for Greeks. By and large residents of Egyptian, Jewish and other non-Greek ethnicities were excluded from receiving citizenship status. As in most Greek poleis, there was a boule (city council) and a court of justice, probably also an assembly and annually elected magistrates. Even though Alexandria was the permanent capital of the Ptolemaic Kingdom, at least initially the royal court would have been considered a foreign political entity in the ostensibly autonomous polis and there would have been a topographical separation between civic space and royal space. (However, the boule was no longer active during Augustus' reign. It is unknown whether it was abolished by him or already during Ptolemaic times.) Alexandria had its own law code which, according to a late antique account, was inscribed on bronze stelae inside the Tychaion. According to a papyrus from the middle of the 3rd century BCE, each of the city's demoi had its own registry office at which all real estate sale contracts had to be registered.

At least by the 2nd century BCE, Alexandrian Jews had been granted their own politeuma, allowing them to administer their own religious and social affairs. The politeuma was lead by an ethnarch and had its own court of justice, administration and archives.

According to surviving documents, residents were identified by their name (including father's and grandfather's name), phyle (district), phratry (neighbourhood) and street:

"of the Berenike phyle: Leon, son of Leon, the son of Aga[...], of the third phratry, of the street of Arsinoe Karpophoros"

A 3rd-century BCE Egyptian papyrus fragment describes the tribal organisation of an unnamed Greek polis which is divided into 720 phratries, twelve of which made up one demos (60 demoi), twelve of which made up one phyle (5 phylai). It has by some scholars been interpreted to refer to Alexandria with its five districts (or possibly Ptolemais). However, Stephanie West suggests that it may instead have been a description of an archetypal, ideal city. Though Clauss assumes that the papyrus does refer to Alexandria, he points out that, even taking into account Alexandria's large size, dividing the city into 720 phratries would have resulted in each phratry containing no more than a few streets.

[Settlements of the Ptolemies, Mueller. Alexandria, Clauss. The Alexandrian Tychaion, McKenzie & Reyes. Alexandria or Utopia, West. Architecture of Alexandria, McKenzie. Oxford Handbook of Roman Egypt. The Royal Palace (chapter), Strootman. Alexandria (OxfordRE Extract), Dominic W. Rathbone.]

List of Sites
This is a non-exhaustive list of known sites in Hellenistic Alexandria, both those known from written sources and those known from archaeological remains. The default order is approximately chronological where possible (with undated structures at the end). Some sites listed as being known only from written sources may also survive in the archaeological record but have simply not yet been excavated or identified.

Legacy
[influence on the art and architecture of other places]

Depictions in the arts and popular media
Ptolemaic Alexandria has been depicted and featured in countless cultural works over the centuries, in large part due to the popularity of Cleopatra VII's life story (see also: List of cultural depictions of Cleopatra). Some notable works include:


 * Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare
 * Cleopatra (1963 film) featuring Elizabeth Taylor
 * Alexander (2004 film) by Oliver Stone
 * Assassin's Creed Origins, an action-adventure video game set in a fictional version of Ptolemaic Egypt