Draft talk:Academic Capitalism

Dispute over the 'sources'
as the author of this article, I have disputed the review, claiming that the sources are not reliable. The argument was placed on the admin talk page, however, he did not answer. The link can be found here. the following is the argument:

I do not agree with the characterization that the references in the article in question were not adequately supported by "reliable sources" The article has eleven references published in peer-reviewed academic journals, and one report was written by a research Johns Hopkins (not reliable?). All sources do mention the theory in the source bodies and support the information in the article. Keep in mind that not every subject is going to have a New York Times or Wash Post article, but this one is most certainly citing 'reliable sources' more than most. In fact, many of these sources are cited on other articles that have been recently approved. The argument for reliable sources is a little bit gray on Wikipedia and it seems to me that many reviews use this template as a quick and easy decline. I would encourage you to actually look at the sites and click on them so that you understand that these are reliable academic sources. Thank you so much for your assistance.

Others are encouraged to participate in the discussion. Geraldine Aino (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)