Draft talk:Bita Razavi

that was a perfectly valid article and whatever artist who gets to Venice Biennale is also notable enough for an article. Not to mention, that the "Articles for creation" system is severely broken. Ivo (talk) 13:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that the "Articles for creation" system is far from ideal. However, once the draft is ready to be an article, it can be moved back. Provided it is done by an editor with enough experience to judge whether it's ready, and without a conflict of interest, I don't care whether it's done through the AfC system or not. I don't know what you mean by a "valid" article, but if you mean it's perfectly good as an article then I have to disagree. Apart from the fact that the current sources are insufficient, at present the content is essentially just a list of her qualifications, places where she has exhibited, awards, etc. I am perfectly willing to believe that she satisfies Wikipedia's notability requirements, and if so there should be no difficulty at all in finding relevant information and adding them to the article, together with citations to their sources. Are you interested in doing so? JBW (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I now made some additions, but don't have the capacity right now to continue. Ivo (talk) 16:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)