Draft talk:Carbon Biosequestration in Ocean

Krishna's Review
Here is my comments after reviewing the article

- The scientific research done is very relevant to the topic of sequestration, which is good - Make sure the formatting is taken care of before final submission. (106) instead of 106 - Also, I believe the citations are not formatted correctly as the page seems to have "ecosystem$\cite{rap4}$" in the article - Some minor edits about grammar needs to be made. Eg. In 2010, there were -- instead of there are - The article reflects the most important information related to biosequestering - There is more weight given to iron Fertilization. May be reduce the parts that might be redundant to that section. - Consider having sub-sections for different methods that are discussed. The order is good but differentiate from main heading - The content is neutral and uses reliable sources--Krishnapatelberk (talk) 19:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)krishnapatelberk


 * , the problem is there are already articles about Biosequestration and Carbon sequestration, so how is this going to be different from that one? Can you check in the MFD whether there should be a separate article and what specifically this is going to address? AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)