Draft talk:Disruption Network Lab

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://landportal.org/nl/organization/disruption-network-lab/ https://guerrillafoundation.org/grantee/disruption-network-lab/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 22:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Illusion Flame - I checked the text and it looks much better now, with very little and very short segments from original website (would be hard to reduce it further due to specific language used in this field). Please check yourself and approve if possible, IMHO it is very good and relevant article we should have had years ago. -- Zblace (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Bias of User:RPSkokie in declining this article Draft
I would challange the bias of User:RPSkokie in declining this article, as I think they have no competence in the subject-matter and likely speak from the position of former military person (this is their key expertise). Though article is far from perfect, it is also well above treshold of notability with this NGO's work being featured in multiple prominent media (especially in Germany) and one of their series resulted in book publication with prominent publisher.

Reviewer was asked to elaborate on issues, but though they formated feedback with does not fully met...the almost fully but (just) not was not elaborated, rather forwarded to most generalized documentation and processes.

I am really curious how many military history articles are blocked by critical media culture workers in English Wikipedia? It is 2023 and issue like this makes one feel things will never change. I would encourage competent editors for the given field to consider contributing and reporting this kind of practices by benevolent reviewers.

-- Zblace (talk) 12:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC)


 * @Zblace, it is less likely for many people to see this, so the advice to ask the question at a centralised noticeboard is a good one. (However, the intended place to do this is WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, not WT:AFC) Unfortunately, there is a rather large backlog at present, so the more specific your question is, the more likely you'd be to get a specific response. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)