Draft talk:Israel Elwyn

Alert on promotionalism
I removed, twice, images that are promotional in nature, showing people  in totally non specific settings that do not help understand the work of the organization. I left one, but I am in doubt about that also, but in general a WP article is considered better if it does have an illustration.

I am not goingto work furter on this in draft space, because I think it is, and will remain, too promotional for an encyclopedia. If it is accepted, which I continue to think it sould not be in its present state,, I will remove the promotionalism  DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

I disagree with the claims. There are 33 references in this article, and it describes an actual and existing association. I was not impressed that this article is more commercial than other articles on Wikipedia about other companies or organisations. The information here is encyclopedic and relevant. Therefore I disagree with the claim that this is an advertising or commercial article. Regards, Danny Danny-w (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)