Draft talk:Jennifer Klein (administrator)

Notability of the subject.
I disagree with the first-pass editorial rejection of this stub on the basis of notability, and two otherwise regularly appearing sources in this article's subject space. Set aside the citation questions as soluble. In re: the question of the individual's notability. I think the brief, unsupported counterargument is misguided, and the the subject is clearly notable:
 * She has held senior leadership positions in women's and gender related areas, including White House positions in 3 recent administrations.
 * She now is the sole head of a WH Council which has a Wikipedia article about it.
 * When the Council was inaugurated in 2021, she was co-chair of that Council, and her co-chair also has a Wikipedia article about them.

She is not a low-level, intern-type or recent college graduate political appointment. She is a senior administration official responsible for developing and voicing some of the most important policies of the Biden administration, including its response to the Supreme court's decision on Dobbs v. Jackson. I cannot fathom a sound basis for a notability exclusion. This women is in the news regularly. 98.206.30.195 (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Rubbish, regarding appearing sources not indicating notability.
These sources appear—now in Further reading, because they are redundant with regard to the coverage of the citations already appearing—but they nevertheless appear, clearly making the case for notability. All mention Klein and her WH Council, under POTUS:

98.206.30.195 (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)