Draft talk:Jruchi I Gospel

speedy deletion?
@SuperMightyBoy hello! i don't understand the reason of speedy deletion. Can you explain your point further? What exactly is wrong with this article? Lemabeta (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey, Lemabeta;
 * as an article which plainly indicates that the subject was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and does not credibly indicate why its subject is important or significant. The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. See WP:A11. SuperMightyBoy (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * So as i understood, more sources are needed to be added? Lemabeta (talk) 14:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, but quickly edit the article before admin deleted these! with follow the Wikipedia Guidelines and add suitable references or sources. SuperMightyBoy (talk) 14:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a subject that was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally and for lack of asserted importance, because... (I have added more sources for the reliability of the article) --Lemabeta (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * But the tag is not placed only for reference or sources, the tag is placed only for the criteria and violet of Wikipedia Guidelines. SuperMightyBoy (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)