Draft talk:Louise Breckon-Richards

resubmitting, issues resolved
original note with submission rejection: "Social media and interviews are not reliable sources. Reviews of her works, while good enough to prove that her credits are true, do not add to the notability of the subject's career and life. A quick Google search shows that there are some reliable sources about the subject but they have not been used here. Please work those in to the article. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 17:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)."

I have removed all social media and interviews from the sources. I have also added performance reviews for the subject, instead of only including reviews of her work. I also added more information about her works themselves, as she also known for producing and writing film and plays. Artemis-red97 (talk) 22:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

resubmitting, better references added
I have updated the article with more information about the subject's work from reliable sources (Variety, The Guardian, etc). I have also found an article in The Guardian discussing the subject herself extensively. I think this subject now meets the notability levels required for an article. I have also asked the Wikipedia:Teahouse community for advice on how to improve the tone and reduce the bias language, and implemented the advice I was given by giving more details about Breckon-Richard's life. Artemis-red97 (talk) 23:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)