Draft talk:Neal Gladstone

Primary Author
I'm the primary author, and have no relationship to the subject, except as a fan of his incredible creative and imaginative music. I was not compensated for writing this in any way.

I've drawn from material from Neal's website, other Internet sources, and information sent to me by Barbara Gladstone, Neal's widow.

Jan Steinman (talk) 08:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * "" is strongly suggestive of a WP:COI. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Barbara sent me documentary information, not point-of-view information. She put me in touch with reporters who have covered Neal and she sent me typical "scrapbook" material, such as press coverage and independent reviews of Neal's work. She put me in touch with Neal's unofficial photographer and his archivist, both of whom were fellow fans and neither of whom were compensated for their work. Does this seem free of CoI?
 * I have purposely kept information from Neal's website to strictly factual material (such as dates, discography, etc.), to avoid CoI. Is that adequate separation from CoI?
 * I'm busy tracing down one statement attributed to her, but which actually came from a reporter. If I find it came to the reporter through Barbara, I will delete it. Jan Steinman (talk) 01:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Jan Steinman The COI needs to be declared on your user page. It is demonstrably present. "" 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Jan Steinman: COI and POV/bias are separate issues. As WP:COI states, Determining that someone has a COI is a description of a situation. It is not a judgment about that person's state of mind or integrity. A COI can exist in the absence of bias, and bias regularly exists in the absence of a COI. If the material you have received from your contact is "strictly factual", that's great, but that in no way negates the COI concern. The very fact that you have been corresponding with, and received information from, sources close to the subject, and are using that to construct this draft, means that there is COI. Could you please now make the necessary disclosure? Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/democratherald/name/neal-gladstone-obituary?id=54886992. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)