Draft talk:Ouroboros (protocol)

Evaluate
I just approved this article because it appears to be well-written and seems to be based on actual academic work. Do you see any glaring problems? Jehochman Talk 05:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * A lot of the academic references aren't peer-reviewed - they're just preprints. This is annoyingly common in blockchain land, to give a sciencey feel to an article when really it's just blog posts in PDF form. Even proceedings are dodgy in cryptocurrency/blockchain land, because a lot of the conferences are highly questionable ... I haven't checked every one; at least a few are in journals at a glance, I think. But functionally, this is cited to blog posts. Might be noteworthy, I'll look further later - David Gerard (talk) 10:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)