Draft talk:Rajput Mughal marriage alliances

Request
@Drmies,@Barkeep49, @Utcursch, @Yamla @Zero0000, @Graham87, @Rosguill, @PhilKnight Any admin can see this wrong draftificantion first then undiscussed/controversial move of the page.? When in AfD prod result Articles for deletion/Rajput Mughal marriage alliances (2nd nomination) for delete or Draftificantion was failed see> then how this Draftificantion then moved to another new name wich one seemed more accurate to move according to push own WP:POV? for the page mover. 2404:3100:1888:CA54:1:0:1997:E81 (talk)
 * This seems like a valid WP:BOLD move following a no consensus discussion. My evaluation of the sources in the Rajput-Mughal version of the article is that insofar as they discuss the topic, they discuss the broader phenomenon of political marriages in India; cited examples discussed in the AfD discussion do not appear to discuss the concept of a Rajput-Mughal marriage alliance in itself but rather just mention examples of them or examine the examples individually as historical events, not as examples of a type. So, with that in mind, it seems like this move and rewrite is strictly an improvement for the article. signed,Rosguill talk 13:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)