Draft talk:Richard Cogdell

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The text used was from the Royal Society website where I am the Publishing Director. There are many other articles on our Fellows which also include their election citation text. For example Wendy Hall Thanks -- Point of Presence  talk  14:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Resolved. Thanks all Point of Presence  talk  10:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Regardless of your role on the website, the content at gla.ac.uk is copyrighted (Copyright © 2017 The Biomolecular spectroscopy & dynamics Cluster (BioC)) and cannot be reused.  Jay  💬 10:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I've removed the unambiguous copyvio, but I've run the remainder through the tool and done a spot check myself and can't see a match. Can you confirm that the current revision of the draft has any copyvio or not? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I am confused. Why are we still discussing a draft when the article itself is now live? There is no content from gla.ac.uk in the article Richard Cogdell. That was removed several days ago. Thanks Point of Presence  talk  11:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree. Why do you want to retain the draft when there is no requirement, now that the sole author has created the standalone article? The copyvio content at this draft is there from verion 1 itself, so all revisions before yours will have to be hidden, if we are to retain this.  Jay  💬 11:29, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I was just patrolling CAT:CSD and saw this outstanding page tagged for WP:G12, and I generally take G12s as a priority to delete. As it is, I've redirected the draft to the main article and revision deleted the obvious copyvio. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)